JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text Full Text (PDF) CME: Take the course for this article: Magnets and Postoperative Pain Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (5) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Cepeda, M. S. Articles by Zarate, C. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Cepeda, M. S. Articles by Zarate, C. Related Collections Economics and Health Care Research Pain

---

AMBULATORY ANESTHESIA

Static Magnetic Therapy Does Not Decrease Pain or Opioid Requirements: A Randomized Double-Blind Trial

M. Soledad Cepeda, MD, PhD^*, Daniel B. Carr, MD, Tony Sarquis, MD^*, Nelcy Miranda, RN^*, Ricardo J. Garcia, MD^*, and Camilo Zarate, MD^*

From the *Department of Anesthesia, San Ignacio Hospital, and Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Javeriana University School of Medicine, Bogota, Colombia; and Department of Anesthesia, Tufts-New England Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

Address correspondence to M. Soledad Cepeda, MD, PhD, Department of Anesthesia Tufts-New England Medical Center, 750 Washington St., Box 298, Boston, MA 02111. Address e-mail to scepeda{at}tufts-nemc.org.

A growing multibillion dollar industry markets magnetic necklaces, bracelets, bands, insoles, back braces, mattresses, etc., for pain relief, although there is little evidence for their efficacy. We sought to evaluate the effect of magnetic therapy on pain intensity and opioid requirements in patients with postoperative pain. We designed a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. One-hundred-sixty-five patients older than 12 yr of age were randomized to magnetic (n = 81) or sham therapy (n = 84) upon reporting moderate-to-severe pain in the postanesthesia care unit. Devices were placed over the surgical incision and left in place for 2 h. Patients rated their pain intensity on a 0–10 scale every 10 min and received incremental doses of morphine until pain intensity was 4 of 10. Pain intensity levels were similar in both groups. The magnet group had on average 0.04 U more pain intensity (95% confidence interval, –0.4 to 0.5) than the sham group. Opioid requirements also were similar in both groups. The active magnet group required 1.5 mg more morphine (95% confidence interval, –1.8 to 4.0) than the sham magnet group. Magnetic therapy lacks efficacy in controlling acute postoperative pain intensity levels or opioid requirements and should not be recommended for pain relief in this setting.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				M. I. Fernandez, P. J. Watson, and D. J. Rowbotham Effect of pulsed magnetic field therapy on pain reported by human volunteers in a laboratory model of acute pain Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2007; 99(2): 266 - 269. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. Dexter Operating Room Efficiency in the National Health Service Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2007; 105(1): 291 - 292. [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. L. Shafer Did Our Brains Fall Out? Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2007; 104(2): 247 - 248. [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. L. Flamm Magnet Therapy: Healing or Hogwash? Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2007; 104(2): 249 - 250. [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. F. White Use of Alternative Medical Therapies in the Perioperative Period: Is It Time to Get on Board? Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2007; 104(2): 251 - 254. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999