JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Batchelder, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Raley, D. M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Batchelder, P. B.
Right arrow Articles by Raley, D. M.

REVIEW

Maximizing the Laboratory Setting for Testing Devices and Understanding Statistical Output in Pulse Oximetry

Paul B. Batchelder, RRT, and Dena M. Raley, BSBE

From the Clinimark Laboratories, Golden, Colorado.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Paul Batchelder, RRT, Clinimark Laboratories, 439 Ronnie Road, Golden, CO 80403. Address e-mail to pbatchelder{at}clinimark.com.

Abstract

Maximizing the laboratory setting for testing baseline pulse oximetry accuracy in an arterial desaturation study requires a study design that considers management of several aspects in the physiology of the test subject, special attention to the device under test, and great care in the preanalytical (sample handling) and analytical (Co-oximeter) phases. Statistics used to describe the resulting SpO2 performance include Precision (size of the data cloud), Bias (offset of the data cloud), and Arms (accuracy root mean square), which combines the size and offset of the data cloud in one number. The Arms is the primary statistic required by regulatory organizations to describe general performance over the entire saturation range. It does not describe any one point, but is a compilation of all points over the range tested. Most pulse oximeters in use today specify an Arms of 2%. To meet this specification, two-thirds of the readings will be within 2% of the Co-oximeter reference; however, some individual readings can be as inaccurate as 6% or more. The Arms statistic does not have the capacity to represent all pulse oximeter behavior. Saturation pop-ups, drop-downs, frozen readings, and periods of no reading are not portrayed by the Arms. The next steps in the advancement of regulatory validation testing would be to develop standards that include an expanded analysis of pulse oximeter performance by assessment of pop-ups, dropouts, frozen readings, and periods of no reading through assessment of sensitivity/specificity and possibly a "Performance Index" similar to the approach taken by Barker.






Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2007 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.