JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2009; 109:886-890
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181af83c1
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME: Take the course for this article:
Course on Intraoperative Awareness during General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Robins, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lyons, G.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Robins, K.
Right arrow Articles by Lyons, G.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Complications
Right arrow Patient Safety


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY

Intraoperative Awareness During General Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Kay Robins, FRCA*, and Gordon Lyons, FRCA, MD{dagger}

From the *Department of Anaesthesia, York Hospital, York; and {dagger}Department of Obstetric Anaesthesia, St. James’ University Hospital, Leeds, UK.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kay Robins, FRCA, Department of Anaesthesia, York Hospital, York YO61 1PS, UK. Address e-mail to kayrobins14{at}hotmail.com.

Abstract

Intraoperative awareness is defined as the spontaneous recall of an event occurring during general anesthesia. A move away from rigid anesthetic protocols, which were designed to limit drug transmission across the placenta, has reduced the incidence of awareness during cesarean delivery to approximately 0.26%. Nevertheless, it remains an undesirable complication with potential for the development of posttraumatic stress disorder. Assessing depth of anesthesia remains a challenge for the anesthesia provider as clinical signs are unreliable and there is no sensitive and specific monitor. Bispectral Index monitoring with the goal of scores <60 has been recommended to prevent awareness. Induction drugs vary in their ability to produce amnesia and the period of hypnotic effect is affected by the rate at which they are redistributed. After initiation of anesthesia, volatile anesthetics should be administered to a target of 0.7 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration, which has been shown to consistently achieve mean Bispectral Index scores <60. Because of its rapid uptake, nitrous oxide remains an important adjunct to reduce the risk of awareness during emergency cesarean delivery. In the absence of fetal compromise, there is no rationale for an inspired oxygen concentration above 0.33. Deeper levels of anesthesia reduce the incidence of awareness; current evidence does not suggest an increased risk of tocolysis or fetal morbidity.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.