Anesth Analg 2009; 109:1219-1224
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b2bd6b
OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY
A Randomized Trial Comparing Colloid Preload to Coload During Spinal Anesthesia for Elective Cesarean Delivery
Sahar M. Siddik-Sayyid, MD, FRCA,
Viviane G. Nasr, MD,
Samar K. Taha, MD,
Reine A. Zbeide, MD,
Jules-Marie A. Shehade, MD,
Ashir A. Al Alami, MD,
Farah H. Mokadem, MD,
Faraj W. Abdallah, MD,
Anis S. Baraka, MD, FRCA, and
Marie T. Aouad, MD
From the Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.
Address correspondence and reprint requests to Marie T. Aouad, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO Box 11-0236, Beirut, Lebanon. Address e-mail to mm01{at}aub.edu.lb.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery is common. Previous studies have demonstrated that a crystalloid fluid "coload" (rapid administration of a fluid bolus starting at the time of intrathecal injection) is superior to the conventional crystalloid preload (fluid administered before the intrathecal injection) for preventing hypotension. Colloid preload provides a sustained increase in central blood volume. We hypothesized that, in contrast to crystalloid, a colloid preload may be more effective than colloid coload for reducing the incidence of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension.
METHODS: In this double-blind study, 178 patients were randomly assigned to receive a preload of 500 mL of hydroxyethyl starch over a period of 15–20 min before initiation of spinal anesthesia (n = 90) or an identical fluid bolus of hydroxyethyl starch starting at the time of identification of cerebrospinal fluid (n = 88). Vasopressors (ephedrine or phenylephrine) were administered if systolic arterial blood pressure decreased less than 80% of the baseline pressure and <100 mm Hg, or with smaller decreases in blood pressure if accompanied by nausea, vomiting, or dizziness. The primary outcome was the incidence of hypotension (defined as the administration of at least one dose of vasopressor).
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the groups in the incidence of hypotension (68% in preload group and 75% in coload group, 95% confidence interval of difference –6%–20%; P = 0.28), doses of ephedrine and phenylephrine, and number of vasopressor unit doses. The incidence of severe hypotension (systolic blood pressure <80 mm Hg) was 16% in the preload group and 22% in the coload group (P = 0.30). There were no differences in the incidence of nausea and/or vomiting, or neonatal outcome between the groups.
CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the incidence of hypotension in women who received colloid administration before the initiation of spinal anesthesia compared with at the time of initiation of anesthesia. Both modalities are inefficient as single interventions to prevent hypotension.
|
