JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2009; 109:1600-1605
© 2009 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b72d35
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Leo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sia, A. T. H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Leo, S.
Right arrow Articles by Sia, A. T. H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Obstetrics
Right arrow Pain
Right arrow Pharmacology


OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY

A Randomized Comparison of Low Doses of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine in Combined Spinal-Epidural Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery

Serene Leo, MMED, Ban Leong Sng, MMED, FANZCA, Yvonne Lim, MMED, and Alex T. H. Sia, MMED

From the Department of Women’s Anaesthesia, Kandang Kerbau Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Singapore.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Serene Leo, Department of Women’s Anaesthesia, KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital, 100 Bukit Timah Rd., Singapore 229899, Singapore. Address e-mail to danxer159{at}yahoo.com.sg.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to investigate the block characteristics of intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 7, 8, or 9 mg administered during combined spinal-epidural anesthesia for cesarean delivery and to elucidate the dose that produces adequate sensory blockade for surgery while minimizing the incidence of hypotension, high neuroblockade, and the need for intraoperative epidural supplementation.

METHODS: Sixty women presenting for elective cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to one of the 3 groups. Group 7 received intrathecal hyperbaric bupivacaine 7 mg, Group 8 received 8 mg, and Group 9 received 9 mg. Women in all 3 groups received intrathecal morphine 100 µg and IV hydroxyethyl starch 15 mL/kg at the time of initiation of combined spinal-epidural anesthesia. Surgery began when a sensory level of T4 was achieved. Patients were monitored for block characteristics and side effects by a blinded observer. Our primary outcome was the maximum cephalad sensory block height.

RESULTS: There was a difference in the maximum extent of cephalad sensory block among groups (Group 7: median T2 [interquartile range T2–T3]; Group 8: median T2 [T1–T2]; Group 9: median T1 [C8–T2]; P = 0.02). However, the time taken to reach T4 was similar in all 3 groups. The incidence of hypotension requiring vasopressors was different among groups (30% in Group 7, 55% in Group 8, and 70% in Group 9; P = 0.04). No patient had inadequate anesthesia. Neonatal outcomes were similar in all 3 groups.

CONCLUSION: The lowest dose of hyperbaric bupivacaine (7 mg) provided equally rapid onset and effective anesthesia for cesarean delivery while reducing the incidence of hypotension compared with 8 and 9 mg. However, because of its shorter duration of anesthesia, it may be feasible only when the block can be reinforced using a functional epidural catheter.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
D. Benhamou and C. Wong
Neuraxial Anesthesia for Cesarean Delivery: What Criteria Define the "Optimal" Technique?
Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2009; 109(5): 1370 - 1373.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2009 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.