JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1977; 56:255-259
© 1977 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by ZAIDAN, J.
Right arrow Articles by SAVARESE, J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by ZAIDAN, J.
Right arrow Articles by SAVARESE, J.

Hemodynamic Effects of Metocurine in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Receiving Propranolol

JAMES ZAIDAN, MD*, DANIEL M. PHILBIN, MD{dagger}, ROBERT ANTONIO, MD{ddagger}, and JOHN SAVARESE, MD{dagger}

*Fellow in Anesthesia. {dagger}Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology. {ddagger}Fellow in Anesthesia.

Abstract

This study was undertaken to determine the circulatory effects of metocurine (dimethyltubo-curarine) in 7 men scheduled for coronary artery surgery who had been receiving propranolol for at least 6 weeks before morphine-N2O-O2 anesthesia. The study was divided into 4 measurement periods: (1) control after induction; (2) 5 minutes after administration of 0.35 mg/ kg of metocurine; (3) 10 minutes after; (4) 20 minutes after. There were no significant changes in mean blood pressure, heart rate (HR), central venous pressure or arterial blood gases throughout the study. Cardiac index rose significantly from a control value of 1.89±0.1 L/min/m2 to 2.39±0.2 L/min/m2 in period 2 and remained elevated throughout (2.53±0.3 and 2.33±0.2 L/min/m2). Systemic vascular resistance (SVR) fell from a control value of 20.2±1.8 units to 16.1±1.6 units in period 2 and remained below control in periods 3 and 4 (17.2±1.8 and 16.9±1.3).

These data suggest that metocurine produced a significant decrease in SVR in the presence of propranolol, resulting in an increase in cardiac output (and stroke volume) in a compensated heart, to maintain perfusion pressure. The possibility of a central (cardiac) effect cannot be excluded, but the lack of an increase in HR suggests it would not be clinically significant.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1977 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.