JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1977; 56:496-500
© 1977 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by TORNETTA, F. J.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by TORNETTA, F. J., PhD

A Comparison of Droperidol, Diazepam, and Hydroxyzine Hydrochloride as Premedication

FRANK J. TORNETTA, PhD, MD*

*Director, Department of Anesthesiology, Montgomery Hospital, Norristown, Pennsylvania 19401.

Abstract

A double-blind comparison of the efficacy and safety of droperidol (5 mg), hydroxyzine HCl (50 mg), diazepam (5 mg), and saline placebo, given concomitantly with meperidine (50 or 75 mg) for preoperative medication, was conducted in 280 female patients scheduled for minor gynecologic procedures.

Droperidol proved to be significantly superior to the other study drugs in alleviating apprehension (83% of patients calm versus 54, 46, and 34% for hydroxyzine, diazepam, and placebo, respectively). Some drowsiness, occurred in 68 percent of the droperidol-treated patients versus 31, 30, and 21 percent of the other 3 groups, respectively. Global evaluations were consistent with these findings.

No clinically significant changes were observed in vital signs in any of the study-drug groups. Adverse reactions were unremarkable in all groups. Significantly less nausea occurred with droperidol than with the other treatments, and significantly less vomiting occurred with droperidol or hydroxyzine. Significantly fewer patients in the droperidol group than in the diazepam group required postoperative antiemetics.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
Y. Kojima, H. Ina, T. Fujita, and H. Mitono
Relieving anxiety by entering the operating room on foot
Can J Anesth, October 1, 2002; 49(8): 885 - 886.
[Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
I. Henzi, J. Sonderegger, and M. R. Tramer
Efficacy, dose-response, and adverse effects of droperidol for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting
Can J Anesth, June 1, 2000; 47(6): 537 - 551.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1977 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.