JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1979; 58:225-234
© 1979 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Winnie, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Durrani, Z.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Winnie, A. P.
Right arrow Articles by Durrani, Z.

Factors Influencing Distribution of Local Anesthetic Injected into the Brachial Plexus Sheath

Alon P. Winnie, MD*, Radisa Radonjic, MD{dagger}, Sudarsana Rao Akkineni, MD{dagger}, and Zia Durrani, MD{dagger}

*Professor. Department of Anesthesiology, Abraham Lincoln School of Medicine, University of Illinois at the Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612 {dagger}Assistant Professor. Department of Anesthesiology, Abraham Lincoln School of Medicine, University of Illinois at the Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612

Abstract

Several technical modifications of the various perivascular techniques of brachial plexus block have been advocated but their efficacy has never been documented. The present study used injections of radiopaque anesthetic solutions to illustrate the effect of various technical maneuvers on the flow of the solutions injected into the sheath at several levels. Axillary block studies indicated that solutions injected through a needle placed high in the axilla and centrally directed achieve a higher level than similar volumes injected through a needle that is perpendicular to the neurovascular bundle at the more traditional lower level. Furthermore, the studies demonstrate that a rubber tourniquet applied around the arm distal to the needle is unable to prevent retrograde flow of the injected solution, especially when the usual volumes utilized clinically are injected. Firm digital pressure applied immediately distal to the needle, on the other hand, is effective in preventing retrograde flow and, in so doing, enhances central flow. Bringing the arm to the side while maintaining digital pressure results in even further central spread by removing the obstacle provided by the head of the abducted humerus.

Studies carried out using the infraclavicular technique indicate that because the direction of the properly placed needle is lateral, most of the injected solution passes distally out along the sheath. Again, firm digital pressure high in the axilla occludes the sheath, preventing distal flow and causing the solution to move centrally.

Studies carried out using the interscalene technique show that with the usual technique the injected solution moves cephalad into the cervical portion of the sheath as well as caudad into the brachial portion. Firm digital pressure applied superior to the needle prevents cephalad flow and thus forces all of the injected solution to move caudally as far as the dome of the lung and laterally into the axillary sheath.

Key Words: ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, Regional: brachial plexus




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
P. B. Cornish, C. J. Leaper, and J. L. Hahn
The "Axillary Tunnel": An Anatomic Reappraisal of the Limits and Dynamics of Spread During Brachial Plexus Blockade
Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2007; 104(5): 1288 - 1291.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
A. Ababou, N. Marzouk, A. Mosadiq, and A. Sbihi
The Effects of Arm Position on Onset and Duration of Axillary Brachial Plexus Block
Anesth. Analg., April 1, 2007; 104(4): 980 - 981.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
A. Serradell, R. Herrero, J. A. Villanueva, J. A. Santos, J. M. Moncho, and J. Masdeu
Comparison of three different volumes of mepivacaine in axillary plexus block using multiple nerve stimulation{dagger}
Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2003; 91(4): 519 - 524.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
S. Sia, M. Bartoli, A. Lepri, O. Marchini, and P. Ponsecchi
Multiple-Injection Axillary Brachial Plexus Block: A Comparison of Two Methods of Nerve Localization-Nerve Stimulation Versus Paresthesia
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2000; 91(3): 647 - 651.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J Hand Surg Eur VolHome page
M. MATSUDA, N. KATO, and M. HOSOI
Continuous Brachial Plexus Block for Replantation in the Upper Extremity
J Hand Surg Eur Vol., June 1, 1982; Original Series, Volume 14(2): 129 - 134.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1979 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.