JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1979; 58:309-313
© 1979 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Maliniak, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vakil, A. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Maliniak, K.
Right arrow Articles by Vakil, A. H.

Pre-Anesthetic Cimetidine and Gastric pH

Keith Maliniak, MD*, and Aman H. Vakil, MD{dagger}

*Instructor in Anesthesiology. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261. {dagger}Clinical Assistant Professor of Anesthesiology. Department of Anesthesiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15261.

Abstract

The effects of pre-anesthetic cimetidine on gastric fluid pH and volume were studied. Twenty-three patients scheduled for elective operation were randomized into two groups. Nasogastric tubes were placed and gastric fluid volume, pH, free acid, and total acid concentration measured the night before operation. Eleven patients received cimetidine, 300 mg IV, 2 hours before induction of anesthesia while the other 12 patients were given glycopyrrolate, 0.3 mg IM, 1 hour before induction of anesthesia. Gastric fluid volume, pH, free acid, and total acid concentration were determined hourly for 2 hours after cimetidine and 1 hour after glycopyrrolate before the induction of anesthesia. The results showed cimetidine to be statistically significantly superior after 1 hour (p < 0.05) and 2 hours (p < 0.001) compared to glycopyrrolate after 1 hour in increasing gastric fluid pH. Cimetidine increased the mean pH from 1.73 ± 0.07 (SE) to 4.43 ± 0.54 (p < 0.001) after 1 hour and to 7.23 ± 0.15 (p < 0.001) after 2 hours. Glycopyrrolate increased the pH from 1.59 ± 0.50 to 2.83 ± 0.49 (p c 0.025) after 1 hour.

Total acid concentration decreased significantly in both groups. In those given cimetidine, the total acid concentration decreased 98% from 47.4 ± 4.5 mEq/L to 0.8 ± 0.79 mEq/L after 2 hours. This 98% decrease in total acid was significantly greater than the 5090 decrease observed 1 hour after glycopyrrolate (from 70 ± 4.6 mEq/L to 35 ± 5.7 mEq/L).

Gastric fluid volume decreased in both groups. In patients given cimetidine, volume decreased from 69.9 ± 17.7 to 24 ± 7.2 ml, 2 hours after cimetidine. In patients given glycopyrrolate gastric volume declined from 76.4 ± 13.6 to 21.0 ± 2.7 ml 1 hour after glycopyrrolate.

These findings demonstrate that cimetidine markedly increases gastric pH from an acid to a neutral range and also decreases gastric fluid volume in preoperative surgical patients.

Key Words: GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT: stomach • HISTAMINE: cimetidine







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1979 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.