JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1979; 58:377-381
© 1979 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Donlon, J. V.
Right arrow Articles by Ali, H. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Donlon, J. V., Jr.
Right arrow Articles by Ali, H. H.

Cumulative Dose-Response Curves for Gall amine

Effect of Altered Resting Thumb Tension and Mode of Stimulation

John V. Donlon, Jr., MD*, John J. Savarese, MD{dagger}, and Hasan H. Ali, MD{ddagger}

Departments of Anesthesia, Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary, Massachusetts General Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

Neuromuscular blockade studies often use the thumb adductor twitch response to ulna nerve stimulation. Two factors that may influence the results are the resting muscle tension (initial fiber length) and the pattern of the stimulus waveform. This study was undertaken to improve understanding of the effect of these factors and lead to better-controlled study conditions and more consistent data. During nitrous oxide barbiturate-narcotic anesthesia in 10 normal adult patients, as the resting thumb tension was increased from 50 to 200 g, the evoked thumb adductor twitch response (Grass stimulator, 0.25 Hz) was augmented by 28%. There was only a 2.5% increase in the evoked (developed) tension when the resting tension was further increased from 200 to 300 g. Developed tension at 50 g was significantly (p < 0.001) less than at the other resting tensions. The developed tension at 100 g was also significantly (p < 0.05) less than at resting tensions of 200 or 300 g.

Cumulative dose-response curves for gall amine in nine patients were not significantly altered by increasing resting tension from 50 to 200 g. Biphasic (Block-Aide monitor) or single square wave (Grass stimulator) stimuli wave forms in nine normal adult patients yielded gall amine dose-response curves that were not statistically different. The muscle response to biphasic stimulation during a non-depolarizing blockade was not affected by the average muscle refractory period.

Because of the significantly lower developed tension at resting tension settings of 50 to 100 g, a practical consideration during neuromuscular function studies would be to have the resting thumb tension adjusted and rechecked for each patient and kept within the 200–300-g range to ensure maximum uniform developed tension. The type of stimulus wave form selected will not affect results as long as it is used consistently throughout the study.

Key Words: NEUROMUSCULAR RELAXANTS: gallamine • NEUROMUSCULAR TRANSMISSION: nerve stimulator • MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES: neuromuscular blockade




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
K. J. Girling, N. M. Bedforth, J. L. Spendlove, and R. P. Mahajan
Assessing Neuromuscular Block at the Larynx: The Effect of Change in Resting Cuff Pressure and a Comparison with Video Imaging in Anesthetized Humans
Anesth. Analg., February 1, 1999; 88(2): 426 - 426.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
ScienceHome page
K. Smith and C. Schauf
Gallamine triethiodide (flaxedil): tetraethylammonium- and pancuronium-like effects in myelinated nerve fibers
Science, June 5, 1981; 212(4499): 1170 - 1172.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1979 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.