JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1988; 67:39-47
© 1988 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Gravlee, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pauca, A. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Gravlee, G. P.
Right arrow Articles by Pauca, A. L.

Rapid Administration of a Narcotic and Neuromuscular Blocker

A Hemodynamic Comparison of Fentanyl, Sufentanil, Pancuronium, and Vecuronium

Glenn P. Gravlee, MD, Frederic M. Ramsey, MD, Raymond C. Roy, MD PhD, Kevin C. Angert, MD, Anne T. Rogers, MBChB, and Alfredo L. Pauca, MD

Received from the Department of Anesthesia, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, North Carolina. Carolina.

Abstract

High-dose narcotic anesthetic inductions usually avoid circulatory depression bettrthan do other techniques; however, the selection of a narcotic and neuromuscular blocker influences subsequent hemodynamic responses. One hundred-one patients having aortocoronary bypass graft (CABG) surgery were investigated using four combinations of a narcotic and neuromuscular blocker: group FP (fentanyl 50 µg/kg, pancuronium 100 µg/kg); group FV (fentanyl 50 µg/kg, vecuronium 80 µg/kg); group SP (sufentanil 10 µg/kg, pancuronium 100 µg/kg); and group SV (sufentanil 10 µg/kg, vecuronium 80 µg/kg), each combination being administered over 2 minutes. Hemodynamic functions were then monitored for 10 minutes before tracheal intubation. Significant changes included increases in heart rate in the groups receiving pancuronium and decreases in those receiving vecuronium. In all groups mean arterial pressure initially decreased; systemic vascular resistance index decreased significantly in all groups except SV. Cardiac index decreased significantly only in group SV. Circulatory depression requiring treatment with vasopressor or anticholinergic drugs was more common in patients given vecuronium. Cardiac arrhythmia occurred most often in group SP; only in group FP were there no arrhythmias, ischemic changes, or hemodynamic disturbances requiring intervention. Time to onset of neuromuscular blockade did not differ among the four groups, but transient chest wall rigidity occurred significantly more often with sufentanil than with fentanyl. Overall, the fentanyl/pancuronium combination afforded the greatest hemodynamic stability, whereas the sufentanil/vecuronium combination proved least satisfactory because of bradycardia and hypotension, requiring treatment in 35% of group SV patients. Differences in anesthetic premedication, social habits, preoperative medications, narcotic and muscle relaxant doses, and speed of anesthetic drug administration may also influence hemodynamicresponses and may explain differing results reported by others using the same drug combinations.

Key Words: ANESTHETICS, INTRAVENOUS—fentanyl, sufentanil • NEUROMUSCULAR RELAXANTS—pancuronium, vecuronium




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
H. Kitahata, K. Tanaka, H. Kimura, S. Kawahito, and S. Oshita
The Feasibility of Gastrothoracic Ventricular Pacing During Transesophageal Echocardiography
Anesth. Analg., July 1, 1999; 89(1): 21 - 21.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1988 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.