| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
The Department of Anesthesia and ICU, Ichilov Hospital, Tel-Aviv Medical Center, and Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel.
Abstract
The effects of intraperitonenl (IP) and lumbar intrathecal (IT) midazolam (MID) on nociception was studied in 38 male albino rats using the noxious tale-flick and hot-plate tests. Four groups received IP 0.1, 1, and 10 mg/kg MID or an equal volume of its vehicle benzyl alcohol 0.1 mg in 1 ml saline, while the other three groups received IT 10 and 100 µg MID or 0.5 µg benzyl alcohol in 5 µl saline. The two higher doses of IP MID produced statistically significant decrease of tale-flick latencies (P < 0.005 and 0.05 at 10 and 100 mg/kg MID, respectively). This hyperalgesic effect could be seen, although the animals appeared highly sedated with reduced motor activity and relatively unresponsive to non-noxious stimuli. In contrast, IT injections of 10 µg MID produced moderate but statistically significant prolongation of tail-flick latencies (P < 0.05) without noticeable change in motor activity. This analgesic effect could not be observed with the higher dose of IT MID until an hour after its administration. The almost complete immobility and ataxia seen after the high doses of IP and IT MID (animals lying on their sides) precluded reliable hot plate testing in these animals. Apparently part of the high IT dose of MID diffused into the brain, as observed after high-dose IP administration. We therefore propose that the analgesic effect of midazolam stems from its action at the spinal level, while its sedative and hyperalgesic effects are a function of its supraspinal action.
Key Words: HYPNOTICS, BENZODIAZEPINES—midazolam.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
R. Iida, K.-i. Iwasaki, J. Kato, S. Saeki, and S. Ogawa Reflex Sympathetic Activity After Intravenous Administration of Midazolam in Anesthetized Cats Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2007; 105(3): 832 - 837. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Nishiyama Analgesic effects of systemic midazolam: comparison with intrathecal administration: [Les effets analgesiques du midazolam a action generale : comparaison avec l'administration intrathecale]. Can J Anesth, October 1, 2006; 53(10): 1004 - 1009. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. L. Yaksh and J. W. Allen The Use of Intrathecal Midazolam in Humans: A Case Study of Process Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2004; 98(6): 1536 - 1545. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
C. K. S. Ong, R. A. Seymour, and J. M.-H. Tan Sedation with Midazolam Leads to Reduced Pain After Dental Surgery Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2004; 98(5): 1289 - 1293. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
Y. Taira, K. Nakakimura, M. Matsumoto, and T. Sakabe Spinal and supraspinal midazolam potentiates antinociceptive effects of isoflurane Br. J. Anaesth., December 1, 2000; 85(6): 881 - 886. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
G Naulaers, E Deloof, C Vanhole, E Kola, and H Devlieger Use of methohexital for elective intubation in neonates Arch. Dis. Child. Fetal Neonatal Ed., July 1, 1997; 77(1): 61F - 64. [Abstract] [Full Text] |
||||
|