JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1988; 67:115-123
© 1988 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Arendt-Nielsen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bjerring, P.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Arendt-Nielsen, L.
Right arrow Articles by Bjerring, P.

Laser-Induced Pain for Evaluation of Local Analgesia

A Comparison of Topical Application (EMLA) and Local Injection (Lidocaine)

Lars Arendt-Nielsen, PhD, and Peter Bjerring, MD

Department of Medical Informatics, Aalborg University, Aalborg, and the Department of Dermatology, Marselisborg Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark.

Abstract

High-energy lasers are suitable for experimental pain stimulation because they selectively activate the polymodal nociceptors. Argon laser light penetrates deep into the skin and makes this laser type preferable for simulating pain arising from surgical skin incisions. Short argon laser pulses were applied to the skin and three parameters were quantified before and during analgesia; sensory threshold, pain threshold, and the pain-related cortical response (latency and amplitude). Determination of sensory and pain thresholds made it possible to distinguish between two levels of analgesia; the pain block, where no pain was felt but other sensations were still perceived; and total sensory block, where the laser stimulus elicited no sensations of any type. The analgetic effects of cutaneous injections of lidocaine and topical application of EMLA (eutectic mixture of local anesthetics) cream were evaluated and compared by means of the introduced parameters. Lidocaine produced total sensory block almost immediately after injection, which was associated with the absence of cortical response to cutaneous laser stimulation. When the EMLA cream was applied for 15 minutes, both sensory and pain thresholds increased. During the next 30 minutes after removal of the cream, the thresholds increased further. The increase in analgetic effect after removal of the cream was studied using different times (15, 30, 60, 80, 100, and 120 minutes) for topical EMLA cream application. Total sensory block was reached 20 minutes after removal of application for 80 minutes or immediately after removal of the cream after it was applied for 100 or 120 minutes. Pain block was achieved 30 minutes after removal of cream applied for 30 minutes, 15 minutes after removal of cream applied for 60 minutes, and immediately after applications for 80, 100, or 120 minutes. During the period of increasing and decreasing analgesia, cortical responses were recorded. Changes in amplitude and latency reflected the changes in perception (intensity and modality) to laser stimuli. In some cases a sensation of local warmth was perceived when pain perception was absent. The sensation of local warmth was accompanied by cortical deflections with a latency of 600–800 ms from stimulus onset, which was 200–300 ms later then the cortical deflections related to pain perception. Thresholds and cortical responses to argon laser stimuli were affected by minor changes in sensitivity of the nociceptors in human skin and were found to be suitable parameters for quantitative evaluations and comparisons of dermal analgesics.

Key Words: PAIN, EXPERIMENTAL—Laser-produced. • ANESTHETICS, LOCAL—topical.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. Sakai, S. Tomiyasu, H. Yamada, T. Ono, and K. Sumikawa
Quantitative and Selective Evaluation of Differential Sensory Nerve Block After Transdermal Lidocaine
Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 248 - 251.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Arch. Dis. Child.Home page
A R Wolf, P A Stoddart, P J Murphy, and M Sasada
Rapid skin anaesthesia using high velocity lignocaine particles: a prospective placebo controlled trial
Arch. Dis. Child., April 1, 2002; 86(4): 309 - 312.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
J. Neurophysiol.Home page
A. Romaniello, J. Valls-Sole, G. D. Iannetti, A. Truini, M. Manfredi, and G. Cruccu
Nociceptive Quality of the Laser-Evoked Blink Reflex in Humans
J Neurophysiol, March 1, 2002; 87(3): 1386 - 1394.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
CLIN PEDIATRHome page
J. Stuart Nelson and J. Applebaum
Clinical Management of Port-Wine Stain in Infants and Young Children Using the Flashlamp-Pulsed Dye Laser
Clinical Pediatrics, September 1, 1990; 29(9): 503 - 508.
[Abstract] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1988 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.