| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||
Received from the Department of Anesthesiology, Trauma Research Center, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel.
Abstract
The systolic pressure variation (5PV), which is the difference between the maximal and minimal values of the systolic blood pressure (SBP) after one positive-pressure breath, was studied in ventilated dogs subjected to hypotension. Mean arterial pressure was decreased to 50 mm Hg for 30 minutes either by hemorrhage (HEM, n = 7) or by continuous infusion of sodium nitroprusside (SNP, n = 7). During HEM-induced hypotension the cardiac output was significantly lower and systemic vascular resistance higher compared with that in the SNP group. The systemic, central venous, pulmonary capillary wedge pressures, and heart rates, were similar in the two groups. Analysis of the respiratory changes in the arterial pressure waveform enabled differentiation between the two groups. The SPV during hypotension was 15.7 ± 6.7 mm Hg in the HEM group, compared with 9.1 ± 2.0mm Hg in the SNP group (P < 0.02). The
down, which is the measure of decrease of SBP after a mechanical breath, was 20.3 ± 8.4 and 10.1 ± 3.8 mm Hg in the HEM and SNP groups, respectively, during hypotension (P < 0.02). It is concluded that increases in the SPV and the
down are characteristic of a hypotensive state due to a predominant decrease in preload. They are thus more important during absolute hypovolemia than during deliberate hypotension.
Key Words: BLOOD PRESSURE—shock and induced hypotension. ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES—induced hypotension. SHOCK— systolic blood pressure.
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
S. Magder Clinical Usefulness of Respiratory Variations in Arterial Pressure Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med., January 15, 2004; 169(2): 151 - 155. [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
M. Golparvar, H. Naddafnia, and M. Saghaei Evaluating the Relationship Between Arterial Blood Pressure Changes and Indices of Pulse Oximetric Plethysmography Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2002; 95(6): 1686 - 1690. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] |
||||
|