JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Ferrante, F. M. Articles by Gallo, J. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Ferrante, F. M. Articles by Gallo, J.

A Statistical Model for Pain in Patient-Controlled Analgesia and Conventional Intramuscular Opioid Regimens

The Pain Treatment Service, Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, and Department of Biostatistics, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

A statistical model was developed: 1) to compare the efficacy of patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) and traditional intramuscular (IM) opioids for pain relief in 40 patients after total knee replacement and, 2) to evaluate pain cycles associated with each technique. Hourly visual analog pain scores were subjected to two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and time-series analysis. Hourly verbal analog pain scores were used to determine predominant pain levels. According to ANOVA, PCA was no more effective than were IM opioids. Time-series analyses documented a complete cycle of pain every 5.3 hours in patients receiving IM opioids but no pain cycle with use of PCA. Analysis of PCA verbal analog scores demonstrated self-administration of opioids to "moderate" levels of pain relief with use of PCA, not to complete analgesia. These results suggest that certain patients may not envision complete postoperative analgesia as being possible. Hence, they self-administer opioids for pain relief with PCA according to their expectations. Population characteristics may modify PCA efficacy. These characteristics should be delineated and the use of PCA targeted to appropriate patients.

Key Words: ANALGESICS—narcotics. • PAIN—postoperative.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				E. R. Viscusi and L. N. Schechter Patient-controlled analgesia: Finding a balance between cost and comfort Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., April 15, 2006; 63(8_Supplement_1): S3 - S13. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. A. Grass Patient-Controlled Analgesia Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5S_Suppl): S44 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				P. J. S. Koo Postoperative pain management with a patient-controlled transdermal delivery system for fentanyl Am. J. Health Syst. Pharm., June 1, 2005; 62(11): 1171 - 1176. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				R. S. Sinatra MD, J. Torres, and A. M. Bustos Pain Management After Major Orthopaedic Surgery: Current Strategies and New Concepts J. Am. Acad. Ortho. Surg., March 1, 2002; 10(2): 117 - 129. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				F. J. Singelyn and J.-M. A. Gouverneur Extended ""Three-in-One"" Block After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Continuous Versus Patient-Controlled Techniques Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2000; 91(1): 176 - 180. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				E. Cohen Postthoracotomy Pain Management Seminars in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia, September 1, 1999; 3(3): 156 - 167. [Abstract] [PDF]

				L. F. Nitschke, C. T. Schlosser, R. L. Berg, J. V. Selthafner, T. J. Wengert, and C. S. Avecilla Does Patient-Controlled Analgesia Achieve Better Control of Pain and Fewer Adverse Effects Than Intramuscular Analgesia? A Prospective Randomized Trial Arch Surg, April 1, 1996; 131(4): 417 - 423. [Abstract] [PDF]

				D. S. Stevens and W. T. Edwards Management of Pain in the Critically Ill J Intensive Care Med, November 1, 1990; 5(6): 258 - 291. [Abstract] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999