JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1988; 67:737-740
© 1988 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Mogensen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kehlet, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Mogensen, T.
Right arrow Articles by Kehlet, H.

The Roles of Acute and Chronic Pain in Regression of Sensory Analgesia During Continuous Epidural Bupivacaine Infusion

Torben Mogensen, MD, Nicholas B. Scott, FRCS (Ed), Claw Lund, MD, Dennis Bigler, MD, Nils-Christian Hjortsø, MD, and Henrik Kehlet, MD, PhD

Received from the Departments of Anesthesiology and Surgical Gatroenterology, Hvidovre University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether regression of sensory analgesia during constant epidural bipuvacaine infusion was different in postoperative patients with acute pain than in patients with chronic nonsurgical pain. Sensory levels of analgesia (to pinprick) and pain (on a five-point scale) were assessed hourly for 16 hours during continuous epidural infusion of 0.5% plain bupivacaine (8 ml/hr) in 12 patients with chronic nonsurgical pain and in 30 patients after major abdominal surgery performed under combined bupivacaine and halothane—N2O general anesthesia. No opiates were given. If sensory analgesia decreased more than five segments from the initial level or if the pain score reached 2 (moderate pain), the patient was removed from the study. Initial levels of sensory analgesia after loading doses of 21.8 ± 0.5 and 19.3 ± 0.8 ml bupivacaine 0.5% were similar (T3.8 ± 0.3, and T3.8 ± 0.5) in the surgical and chronic pain patients, respectively (mean ± SEM). Of the surgical patients, only 4 of the 30 (13%) maintained the initial level of sensory analgesia, and a pain score below 2 throughout the study compared with 7 of the 12 patients with chronic pain (58%) (P < 0.01). Mean duration of sensory blockade was significantly longer (P < 0.005) in the patients with chronic pain than in surgical patients (13.1 ± 1.2 and 8.5 ± 0.7 hours, respectively). Thus, surgical injury hastens regression of sensory analgesia during continuous epidural bupivacaine infusion. The underlying mechanism remains to be determined.

Key Words: PAIN, CHRONIC—postoperative • ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES, EPIDURAL—bupivacaine







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1988 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.