JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
		QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced] Author: Keyword(s): Year:  Vol:  Page:

This Article Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a colleague Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in PubMed Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Concepcion, M. A. Articles by Covino, B. G. Search for Related Content PubMed PubMed Citation Articles by Concepcion, M. A. Articles by Covino, B. G.

Tourniquet Pain During Spinal Anesthesia

A Comparison of Plain Solutions of Tetracaine and Bupivacaine

Received from the Department of Anesthesia, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Abstract

The incidence of tourniquet pain was evaluated in 40 patients having orthopedic surgery of the lower extremities during spinal anesthesia using 15 mg of a plain solution of either 0.5% tetracaine or 0.5% bupivacaine. The drugs were administered in a randomized fashion, and measurement of the levels of sensory anesthesia to pinprick and motor blockade as well as the occurrence of tourniquet pain were made by an independent blinded observer. The onset and maximum cephalad spread of sensory anesthesia and the onset and degree of motor block were similar in both groups of patients. However, the duration of sensory anesthesia was significantly longer in patients in whom tetracaine was used. The incidence of tourniquet pain was significantly greater in patients given tetracaine (60%) than in patients given bupivacaine (25%). The occurrence of tourniquet pain was not related to the level of sensory anesthesia, because patients in the tetracaine group had a higher level of sensory anesthesia (mean T6) than did patients in the bupivacaine group (mean T10) at the onset of tourniquet pain. It is speculated that during spinal anesthesia both A and C fibers (mediating fast and slow pain, respectively) are initially equally inhibited. However, as the concentration of local anesthetic in the cerebrospinal fluid declines, C fibers may become unblocked earlier with tetracaine than A fibers, resulting in tourniquet pain in the presence of an otherwise satisfactory spinal anesthetic.

Key Words: ANESTHETICS; LOCAL—tetracaine, bupivacaine • PAIN—tourniquet • ANESTHETIC TECHNIQUES—spinal

This article has been cited by other articles:

				D. T. Warren and D. J. Kopacz Spinal 2-Chloroprocaine: The Effect of Added Dextrose Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 95 - 101. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				C.-H. Cherng, C.-S. Wong, F.-L. Chang, S.-T. Ho, and C.-H. Lee Epidural Morphine Delays the Onset of Tourniquet Pain During Epidural Lidocaine Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., June 1, 2002; 94(6): 1614 - 1616. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999