JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 1993; 76:10-17
© 1993 International Anesthesia Research Society
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Avram, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaczynski, D. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Avram, M. J.
Right arrow Articles by Kaczynski, D. A.

Determinants of Thiopental Induction Dose Requirements

Michael J. Avram, PHD, Reema Sanghvi, MD, Thomas K. Henthorn, MD, Tom C. Krejcie, MD, Colin A. Shanks, MD, Robert J. Fragen, MD, Kathleen A. Howard, BS, and Debora A. Kaczynski, BS

Department of Anesthesia, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois

Abstract

Dose requirements for thiopental anesthetic induction have significant age- and gender-related variability. We studied the association of the patient characteristics age, gender, weight, lean body mass, and cardiac output with thiopental requirements. Doses of thiopental, infused at 150 mg/min, required to reach both a clinical end-point and an electroencephalographic (EEG) end-point were determined in 30 males and 30 females, aged 18--83 yr. Univariate least squares linear regression analysis revealed outliers in the relationships of age, weight, lean body mass, and cardiac output to thiopental dose at clinical and EEG endpoints. Differential weighting of data points minimized the effect of outliers in the construction of a robust multiple linear regression model of the relationship between several selected independent variables and the dependent variables thiopental dose at clinical and EEG endpoints. The multiple linear regression model for thiopental dose at the clinical end-point selecting the regressor variables age, weight, and gender (R2 = 0.76) was similar to that for age, lean body mass, and gender (R2 = 0.75). Thiopental dose at the EEG end-point was better described by models selecting the variables age, weight, and cardiac output (R2 = 0.88) or age, lean body mass, and cardiac output (R2 = 0.87). Although cardiac output varied with age, age always remained a selected variable. Because weight and lean body mass differed with gender, their selection as variables in the model eliminated gender as a selected variable or minimized its importance.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.Home page
M. J. Avram, T. C. Krejcie, T. K. Henthorn, and C. U. Niemann
{beta}-Adrenergic Blockade Affects Initial Drug Distribution Due to Decreased Cardiac Output and Altered Blood Flow Distribution
J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., November 1, 2004; 311(2): 617 - 624.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
E. Erhan, G. Ugur, I. Gunusen, I. Alper, and B. Ozyar
Propofol - not thiopental or etomidate - with remifentanil provides adequate intubating conditions in the absence of neuromuscular blockade: [Le propofol, mais non le thiopental ou l'etomidate, combine au remifentanil, permet des conditions d'intubation satisfaisantes en l'absence de blocage neuromusculaire]
Can J Anesth, February 1, 2003; 50(2): 108 - 115.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
S. Thompson and G. B. Drummond
Loss of volition and pain response during induction of anaesthesia with propofol or sevoflurane
Br. J. Anaesth., August 1, 2001; 87(2): 283 - 286.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Br J AnaesthHome page
T. L. Strickland and G. B. Drummond*
Comparison of pattern of breathing with other measures of induction of anaesthesia, using propofol, methohexital, and sevoflurane{{dagger}}
Br. J. Anaesth., May 1, 2001; 86(5): 639 - 644.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Canadian J. AnesthesiaHome page
O. H.G. Wilder-Smith, P. A. Ravussin, L. A. Decosterd, P. A. Despland, and B. Bissonnette
Midazolam premedication reduces propofol dose requirements for multiple anesthetic endpoints
Can J Anesth, May 1, 2001; 48(5): 439 - 445.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
Y. U. Adachi, K. Watanabe, H. Higuchi, and T. Satoh
The Determinants of Propofol Induction of Anesthesia Dose
Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2001; 92(3): 656 - 661.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
Anesth. Analg.Home page
T. C. Krejcie and M. J. Avram
What Determines Anesthetic Induction Dose? It's the Front-End Kinetics, Doctor!
Anesth. Analg., September 1, 1999; 89(3): 541 - 541.
[Full Text] [PDF]




Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 1993 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.