Anesthesia & Analgesia, Vol 83, 716-720, Copyright © 1996 by International Anesthesia Research Society

GENERAL ARTICLES

Spinal bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: the effect of saline dilution

B Ben-David, H Levin, E Solomon, H Admoni and S Vaida
Department of Anesthesia, Herzlia-Haifa (Horev) Medical Center, Israel.

The safety of lidocaine spinal anesthesia has recently been called into question by reports of both permanent and transient neurologic toxicity. This study explored the possibility of adapting the longer acting spinal bupivacaine to ambulatory surgery. Sixty patients presenting for ambulatory arthroscopy were randomized to four groups receiving the following spinal anesthetics: Group I (15 mg bupivacaine), 3 mL of 0.5% spinal bupivacaine in 8% dextrose; Group II (10 mg bupivacaine), 2 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine+1 mL saline; Group III (7.5 mg bupivacaine), 1.5 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine%1.5 mL saline; Group IV (5 mg bupivacaine), 1 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine+2 mL saline. Maximum block height was T-5 in Group I versus T-8 in the other groups. Onset times to peak block were similar in all groups and averaged 14 min. Time to two-segment regression, complete regression, micturition, and discharge were significantly reduced from Group I to Group II and from Group II to Group III. Reductions in times between Groups III and IV did not achieve statistical significance. Times from placement of the spinal block until discharge were 471 +/- 35, 260 +/- 15,202 +/- 14, and 181 +/- 8 min, respectively, for the four groups. The intensity of motor block decreased significantly from group to group, such that 13 of the 15 patients in Group IV failed to achieve Bromage level 2 or 3. The intensity of sensory block also decreased from group to group with four patients in Group IV having pain intraoperatively that required further treatment. Therefore, Group III provided the optimum combination of adequate depth of anesthesia and rapid recovery. The results of this study indicate that spinal anesthesia with 7.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine in 8% dextrose diluted with an equal volume of saline provides an acceptable spinal anesthetic for ambulatory arthroscopy with a recovery profile appropriate to the ambulatory setting.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				S.-J. Lee, S.-J. Bai, J.-S. Lee, W.-O. Kim, Y.-S. Shin, and K.-Y. Lee The Duration of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Mixed with Lidocaine Anesth. Analg., September 1, 2008; 107(3): 824 - 827. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				I. T. Awad and F. Chung Factors affecting recovery and discharge following ambulatory surgery: [Les facteurs influencant la recuperation et la sortie apres une operation en chirurgie ambulatoire]. Can J Anesth, September 1, 2006; 53(9): 858 - 872. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. Minville, O. Fourcade, D. Grousset, C. Chassery, L. Nguyen, K. Asehnoune, A. Colombani, L. Goulmamine, and K. Samii Spinal anesthesia using single injection small-dose bupivacaine versus continuous catheter injection techniques for surgical repair of hip fracture in elderly patients. Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2006; 102(5): 1559 - 1563. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				K. Asehnoune, E. Larousse, J. M. Tadie, V. Minville, S. Droupy, and D. Benhamou Small-Dose Bupivacaine-Sufentanil Prevents Cardiac Output Modifications After Spinal Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., November 1, 2005; 101(5): 1512 - 1515. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				A. Sell, K. T. Olkkola, J. Jalonen, and R. Aantaa Minimum effective local anaesthetic dose of isobaric levobupivacaine and ropivacaine administered via a spinal catheter for hip replacement surgery Br. J. Anaesth., February 1, 2005; 94(2): 239 - 242. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. R. Yoos and D. J. Kopacz Spinal 2-Chloroprocaine: A Comparison with Small-Dose Bupivacaine in Volunteers Anesth. Analg., February 1, 2005; 100(2): 566 - 572. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Hocking and J. A. W. Wildsmith Intrathecal drug spread Br. J. Anaesth., October 1, 2004; 93(4): 568 - 578. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. E. Kouri and D. J. Kopacz Spinal 2-Chloroprocaine: A Comparison with Lidocaine in Volunteers Anesth. Analg., January 1, 2004; 98(1): 75 - 80. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. Beilin, J. Zahn, S. Abramovitz, H. H. Bernstein, S. Hossain, and C. Bodian Subarachnoid Small-Dose Bupivacaine Versus Lidocaine for Cervical Cerclage Anesth. Analg., July 1, 2003; 97(1): 56 - 61. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. T. Kawamata, K. Nishikawa, T. Kawamata, K. Omote, M. Igarashi, M. Yamauchi, K. Sato, M. Nakayama, and A. Namiki A Comparison of Hyperbaric 1% and 3% Solutions of Small-Dose Lidocaine in Spinal Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., March 1, 2003; 96(3): 881 - 884. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. V. Valanne, A.-M. Korhonen, R. M. Jokela, P. Ravaska, and K. K. Korttila Selective Spinal Anesthesia: A Comparison of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine 4 mg Versus 6 mg for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy Anesth. Analg., December 1, 2001; 93(6): 1377 - 9. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				J. C. Rader Regional anesthesia in ambulatory surgery Can J Anesth, June 1, 2001; 48(90001): R9 - 9. [Full Text] [PDF]

				M. F. Mulroy, K. L. Larkin, P. S. Hodgson, J. D. Helman, J. E. Pollock, and S. S. Liu A Comparison of Spinal, Epidural, and General Anesthesia for Outpatient Knee Arthroscopy Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(4): 860 - 864. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				B. Ben-David, M. Maryanovsky, A. Gurevitch, C. Lucyk, D. Solosko, R. Frankel, G. Volpin, and P. J. DeMeo A Comparison of Minidose Lidocaine-Fentanyl and Conventional-Dose Lidocaine Spinal Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., October 1, 2000; 91(4): 865 - 870. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				G. Fanelli, B. Borghi, A. Casati, L. Bertini, M. Montebugnoli, and G. Torri Unilateral bupivacaine spinal anesthesia for outpatient knee arthroscopy Can J Anesth, August 1, 2000; 47(8): 746 - 751. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. W. S. Chan, P. Peng, H. Chinyanga, S. Lazarou, J. Weinbren, and Z. Kaszas Determining Minimum Effective Anesthetic Concentration of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine for Spinal Anesthesia Anesth. Analg., May 1, 2000; 90(5): 1135 - 1140. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				V. M. Zayas, G. A. Liguori, M. F. Chisholm, M. H. Susman, and M. A. Gordon Dose Response Relationships for Isobaric Spinal Mepivacaine Using the Combined Spinal Epidural Technique Anesth. Analg., November 1, 1999; 89(5): 1167 - 1167. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]

				S. I. Marshall and F. Chung Discharge Criteria and Complications After Ambulatory Surgery Anesth. Analg., March 1, 1999; 88(3): 508 - 508. [Full Text] [PDF]

Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999