<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org">
<title>Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia recent issues</title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org</link>
<description>Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia RSS feed -- recent issues</description>
<prism:publicationName>Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia</prism:publicationName>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/737?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/739?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/742?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/746?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/748?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/749?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/755?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/762?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/769?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/776?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/783?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/788?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/791?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/793?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/799?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/806?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/811?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/818?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/824?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/832?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/849?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/855?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/859?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/862?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/864?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/868?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/875?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/879?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/885?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/890?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/905?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/909?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/915?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/921?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/926?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/932?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/938?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/941?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/945?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/948?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/956?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/962?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/965?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/972?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/979?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/989?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/994?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/999?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1005?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1011?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1018?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1026?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1040?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1041?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1045?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1052?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1058?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1064?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1070?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1075?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1079?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1082?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1082-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1083?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1083-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1084?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1084-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1084-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1085?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1085-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1085-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1086?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1087?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1087-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1088?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1089?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1090?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/1091?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/353?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/356?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/359?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/362?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/365?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/371?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/379?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/382?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/391?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/398?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/402?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/406?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/410?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/413?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/422?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/429?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/439?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/445?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/452?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/459?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/469?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/479?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/486?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/494?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/507?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/525?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/534?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/541?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/545?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/549?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/552?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/570?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/591?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/601?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/607?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/614?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/620?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/625?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/630?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/636?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/643?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/648?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/652?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/661?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/665?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/669?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/673?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/686?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/693?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/701?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/708?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/722?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/722-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/723?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/724?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/724-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/725?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/726?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/726-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/727?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/728?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/729?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/729-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/731?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/732?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/732-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/733?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/2/736?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/1?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/4?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/6?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/9?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/11?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/15?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/21?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/29?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/33?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/37?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/51?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/59?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/70?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/77?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/83?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/96?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/102?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/107?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/113?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/117?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/125?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/130?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/138?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/144?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/149?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/155?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/159?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/167?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/171?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/178?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/185?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/193?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/201?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/215?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/221?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/226?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/229?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/232?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/238?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/239?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/250?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/264?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/271?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/282?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/292?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/299?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/300?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/309?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/318?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/325?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/333?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/339?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/342?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/342-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/343?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/343-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/344?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/344-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/344-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/345?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/345-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/346?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/346-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/347?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/348?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/349?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/349-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/1/350?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1599?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1603?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1605?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1611?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1619?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1627?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1633?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1636?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1639?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1643?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1659?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1664?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1670?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1681?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1708?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1712?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1715?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1723?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1728?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1733?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1741?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1749?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1759?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1765?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1772?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1778?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1784?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1787?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1798?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1803?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1808?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1813?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1820?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1827?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1833?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1837?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1844?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1847?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1853?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1856?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1862?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1868?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1873?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1882?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1890?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1897?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1904?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1910?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1916?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1921?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1921-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1921-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1922?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1922-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1922-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1923?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1924?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1924-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1924-b?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1925?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1925-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1926?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1926-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1927?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1927-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1928?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1928-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1930?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1931?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1931-a?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/106/6/1932?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Anesthesia &amp; Analgesia</title>
<url>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/737?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Evolution of Anesthetic Sensitivity and the Evolution of a Paper]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/737?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Durieux, M. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Genetics, Preclinical Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817d865a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Evolution of Anesthetic Sensitivity and the Evolution of a Paper]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>738</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>737</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/739?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Nicotine and Postoperative Management of Pain]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/739?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benowitz, N. L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Pain Mechanisms, Pain Medicine, Preclinical Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology, Pain, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181813508</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Nicotine and Postoperative Management of Pain]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>741</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>739</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/742?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Induction of Heat Shock Protein 70 and Preconditioning by Sevoflurane: A Potent Protective Interaction Against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/742?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pagel, P. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Mechanisms, Preclinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f6d40</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Induction of Heat Shock Protein 70 and Preconditioning by Sevoflurane: A Potent Protective Interaction Against Myocardial Ischemia-Reperfusion Injury]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>745</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>742</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/746?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introducing Focused Reviews in Obstetric Anesthesiology: A New Series]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/746?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wong, C. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Obstetrics, Education]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e318181bb61</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introducing Focused Reviews in Obstetric Anesthesiology: A New Series]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>747</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>746</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/748?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[It Takes an Entrepreneur]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/748?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Feldman, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[History, Monitoring (Non-cardiac), Technology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817b65d2</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[It Takes an Entrepreneur]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>748</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>748</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/749?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Introduction of New Monitors into Clinical Anesthesia]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/749?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Vidal Melo, M. F., Leone, B. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Complications, Monitoring (Cardiac), Technology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817708c3</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Introduction of New Monitors into Clinical Anesthesia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>750</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>749</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>EDITORIALS</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/755?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Low-Dose Sevoflurane Inhalation Enhances Late Cardioprotection from the Anti-Ulcer Drug Geranylgeranylacetone]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/755?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> We investigated in rabbits whether sevoflurane enhances late cardioprotection induced by geranylgeranylacetone (GGA), a gastric antiulcer drug.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> S(+)-ketamine and xylazine-anesthetized rabbits were assigned to one of seven experimental groups: a control (vehicle only) group, a GGA group, a sevoflurane group, a GGA+sevoflurane group, a sodium 5-hydroxydecanoate (5HD) group, a GGA + 5HD group, and a heat stress group. All rabbits were subjected to 30 min of coronary artery occlusion followed by 3 h of reperfusion. Rabbits were pretreated with IV vehicle, GGA (10 mg/kg), or heat stress (42&deg;C for 15 min) 24 h before coronary occlusion. Sevoflurane (0.5 minimum alveolar concentration) or 5HD (5 mg/kg) were administered before myocardial ischemia. Myocardial infarct size and the area at risk for ischemia were measured, and heat shock protein (Hsp) 70 levels in each experimental group were determined.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Compared with vehicle only, GGA significantly reduced the size of myocardial infarction in relation to the area at risk (39 &plusmn; 10% vs 59 &plusmn; 9%, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.02). Sevoflurane enhanced the GGA-induced cardioprotection (23 &plusmn; 17%, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.05 vs GGA). The cardioprotective effect of GGA was abolished by administration of 5HD (56 &plusmn; 15%, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). GGA enhanced Hsp 70 expression compared with that in the control group (0.69 &plusmn; 0.15 vs 0.36 &plusmn; 0.05, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.02). Administration of GGA with sevoflurane resulted in the same level of Hsp 70 expression as GGA (0.69 &plusmn; 0.16, <I>P</I> &gt; 0.98).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> GGA appears to reduce myocardial infarct size in association with increased Hsp 70 expression. Sevoflurane enhances the GGA-induced cardioprotective effect.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kitahata, H., Nozaki, J., Kawahito, S., Tomino, T., Oshita, S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Mechanisms, Heart, Preclinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f0e61</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Low-Dose Sevoflurane Inhalation Enhances Late Cardioprotection from the Anti-Ulcer Drug Geranylgeranylacetone]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>761</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>755</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/762?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Mechanism of Helium-Induced Preconditioning: A Direct Role for Nitric Oxide in Rabbits]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/762?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Helium produces preconditioning against myocardial infarction by activating prosurvival signaling, but whether nitric oxide (NO) generated by endothelial NO synthase plays a role in this phenomenon is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that NO mediates helium-induced cardioprotection <I>in vivo</I>.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Rabbits (<I>n</I> = 62) instrumented for hemodynamic measurement were subjected to a 30-min left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion and 3 h reperfusion, and received 0.9% saline (control) or three cycles of 70% helium&ndash;30% oxygen administered for 5 min interspersed with 5 min of an air&ndash;oxygen mixture before left anterior descending coronary artery occlusion in the absence or presence of pretreatment with the nonselective NOS inhibitor <I>N</I>-nitro-l-arginine methyl ester (L-NAME; 10 mg/kg), the selective inducible NOS inhibitor aminoguanidine hydrochloride (AG; 300 mg/kg), or selective neuronal NOS inhibitor 7-nitroindazole (7-NI; 50 mg/kg). In additional rabbits, the fluorescent probe 4,5-diaminofluroscein diacetate (DAF-2DA) and confocal laser microscopy were used to detect NO production in the absence or presence of helium with or without L-NAME pretreatment.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Helium reduced (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) infarct size (24% &plusmn; 4% of the left ventricular area at risk; mean &plusmn; sd) compared with control (46% &plusmn; 3%). L-NAME, AG, and 7-NI did not alter myocardial infarct size when administered alone. L-NAME, but not 7-NI or AG, abolished helium-induced cardioprotection. Helium enhanced DAF-2DA fluorescence compared with control (26 &plusmn; 8 vs 15 &plusmn; 5 U, respectively). Pretreatment with L-NAME abolished these helium-induced increases in DAF-2DA fluorescence.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> The results indicate that cardioprotection by helium is mediated by NO that is probably generated by endothelial NOS <I>in vivo</I>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pagel, P. S., Krolikowski, J. G., Pratt, P. F., Shim, Y. H., Amour, J., Warltier, D. C., Weihrauch, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Mechanisms, Preclinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181815995</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Mechanism of Helium-Induced Preconditioning: A Direct Role for Nitric Oxide in Rabbits]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>768</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>762</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/769?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Inhibition of Glycogen Synthase Kinase or the Apoptotic Protein p53 Lowers the Threshold of Helium Cardioprotection In Vivo: The Role of Mitochondrial Permeability Transition]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/769?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Prosurvival signaling kinases inhibit glycogen synthase kinase-3&beta; (GSK-3&beta;) activity and stimulate apoptotic protein p53 degradation. Helium produces cardioprotection by activating prosurvival kinases, but whether GSK and p53 inhibition mediate this process is unknown. We tested the hypothesis that inhibition of GSK or p53 lowers the threshold of helium cardioprotection via a mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP)-dependent mechanism.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Rabbits (<I>n</I> = 85) instrumented for hemodynamic measurement and subjected to a 30 min left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) occlusion and 3 h reperfusion received 0.9% saline (control), or 1, 3, or 5 cycles of 70% helium-30% oxygen administered for 5 min interspersed with 5 min of an air-oxygen mixture (fraction of inspired oxygen concentration = 0.30) before LAD occlusion. Other rabbits received the GSK inhibitor SB 216763 (SB21; 0.2 or 0.6 mg/kg), the p53 inhibitor pifithrin- (PIF; 1.5 or 3.0 mg/kg), or SB21 (0.2 mg/kg) or PIF (1.5 mg/kg) plus helium (1 cycle) before LAD occlusion in the presence or absence of the mPTP opener atractyloside (5 mg/kg).</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Helium reduced (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.05) myocardial infarct size (35 &plusmn; 6 [<I>n</I> = 7], 25 &plusmn; 4 [<I>n</I> = 7], and 20 &plusmn; 3% [<I>n</I> = 6] of area at risk, 1, 3, and 5 cycles, respectively) compared with control (44 &plusmn; 6% [<I>n</I> = 7]). SB21 (0.6 [<I>n</I> = 7] but not 0.2 mg/kg [<I>n</I> = 6]) and PIF (3.0 [<I>n</I> = 6] but not 1.5 mg/kg [<I>n</I> = 7]) also reduced necrosis. SB21 (0.2 mg/kg) or 1.5 mg/kg PIF (1.5 mg/kg) plus helium (1 cycle; <I>n</I> = 6 per group) decreased infarct size to an equivalent degree as three cycles of helium alone, and this cardioprotection was blocked by atractyloside (<I>n</I> = 7 per group).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> Inhibition of GSK or p53 lowers the threshold of helium-induced preconditioning via a mPTP-dependent mechanism <I>in vivo</I>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Pagel, P. S., Krolikowski, J. G., Pratt, P. F., Shim, Y. H., Amour, J., Warltier, D. C., Weihrauch, D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Mechanisms, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181815b84</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Inhibition of Glycogen Synthase Kinase or the Apoptotic Protein p53 Lowers the Threshold of Helium Cardioprotection In Vivo: The Role of Mitochondrial Permeability Transition]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>775</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>769</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/776?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Attenuation of Isoflurane-Induced Preconditioning and Reactive Oxygen Species Production in the Senescent Rat Heart]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/776?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Although attenuation of anesthetic preconditioning in aged <I>ex vivo</I> heart models has been studied extensively, there are no comparable <I>in vivo</I> studies. To extend previous work and to address a possible mechanism underlying age-related differences, we investigated isoflurane-induced preconditioning and reactive oxygen species (ROS) production in the aged rat heart <I>in vivo</I>.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Male Fisher 344 rats were assigned from their respective age groups (young, 3&ndash;5 mo; old, 20&ndash;24 mo) to either receive 30 min of 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration isoflurane or to a control group. Rats were subjected to coronary artery occlusion for 30 min followed by 2 h of reperfusion. A fluorescent probe for superoxide anion production (dihydroethidium, 1 mg) was administered in the absence of the isoflurane or just before isoflurane exposure in four additional groups. Myocardial infarct size and superoxide anion production were assessed using triphenyltetrazolium staining and epifluorescence microscopy, respectively.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Isoflurane decreased myocardial infarct size of young rats (26.7% &plusmn; 3.0%) compared with young controls (50.9% &plusmn; 1.9%; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.001), whereas isoflurane did not significantly affect myocardial infarct size of old rats (39.1% &plusmn; 0.9%) compared with old controls (46.5% &plusmn; 2.4%; <I>P</I> &gt; 0.05). Isoflurane increased ROS levels in young rats (430.5 &plusmn; 95.9 arbitrary units [AU]) compared with young controls (162.7 &plusmn; 25.5 AU; <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). In contrast, no significant changes in ROS levels were observed in old animals (316.4 &plusmn; 56.3 AU isoflurane versus 233.8 &plusmn; 59.2 AU control).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> Reduction in the cardioprotective effects of isoflurane and attenuation of isoflurane-stimulated ROS production were observed in the senescent myocardium <I>in vivo</I>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nguyen, L. T., Rebecchi, M. J., Moore, L. C., Glass, P. S. A., Brink, P. R., Liu, L.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Mechanisms, Preclinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e318180419d</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Attenuation of Isoflurane-Induced Preconditioning and Reactive Oxygen Species Production in the Senescent Rat Heart]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>782</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>776</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/783?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Efficacy of Aprotinin in Arterial Switch Operations in Infants]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/783?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> In the present study we assessed whether aprotinin at a total dose (40,000 kallikrein inhibitor units (KIU)/kg) is effective in reducing postoperative blood loss and blood product requirement after arterial switch operations in infants.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> A prospective, double-blind, randomized study, evaluated 50 infants who underwent arterial switch operations for transposition of great arteries. Patients were randomized into a placebo group, 25 patients who received normal saline and a treatment group, 25 patients who received 20,000 KIU/kg of aprotinin after induction of anesthesia, followed by 20,000 KIU/kg of aprotinin added to pump prime. Postoperative blood loss through the thoracic chest tubes and blood product requirements (mL/kg/24 h) were measured for the first 24 h in the intensive care unit.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Postoperative blood loss in the first 24 h was significantly (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001) higher in the placebo group (49.7 &plusmn; 11.9 mL/kg/24 h) as compared to the aprotinin group (37.1 &plusmn; 3.5 mL/kg/24 h). Requirements for fresh frozen plasma (mL/kg/24 h) and use of platelet concentrate transfusion (mL/kg/24 h) were significantly less in patients who received aprotinin (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.0001), but did not reduce the proportion of patients transfused with blood products. The number of total donor exposures to all allogenic blood products was less in the aprotinin group [range (median) = 2&ndash;4 (3)] than the placebo group [range (median) = 7&ndash;14 (10)]. The re-exploration for excessive bleeding was significantly less with aprotinin group (16% vs 32%) (<I>P</I> = 0.01).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION: </b> Our study concludes that aprotinin decreased the postoperative blood loss and requirement of transfusion of fresh frozen plasma and platelets (mL/kg/24 h) during the early postoperative period. Further, it reduced the number of donor exposures and re-exploration for excessive bleeding in the treatment population.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Murugesan, C., Banakal, S. K., Garg, R., Keshavamurthy, S., Muralidhar, K.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Coagulation, Pediatrics, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f8b2c</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Efficacy of Aprotinin in Arterial Switch Operations in Infants]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>787</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>783</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/788?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Incidental Finding of Superior Vena Cava Mass Missed on Transesophageal Echocardiography but Seen on Epiaortic Imaging]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/788?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mizuguchi, K. A., Fox, A. A., Burch, T. M., Locke, A., Davidson, M. J., Fox, J. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Monitoring (Cardiac), Echo Rounds, Video Clip]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f8b5b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Incidental Finding of Superior Vena Cava Mass Missed on Transesophageal Echocardiography but Seen on Epiaortic Imaging]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>790</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>788</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/791?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transesophageal Echocardiography in a Patient in Hemodynamic Compromise After Jarvik 2000 TM Implantation: The Suckdown Effect]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/791?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mauermann, W. J., Rehfeldt, K. H., Park, S. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Echo Rounds, Video Clip, Technology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181806009</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transesophageal Echocardiography in a Patient in Hemodynamic Compromise After Jarvik 2000 TM Implantation: The Suckdown Effect]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>792</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>791</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/793?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: An Important Monitoring Tool During Hybrid Aortic Arch Replacement]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/793?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Near-infrared spectroscopy can be helpful for monitoring the adequacy of cerebral perfusion during cardiovascular surgery. We report changes seen in regional oxygen saturation due to intraoperative thrombosis of the left common carotid artery graft during hybrid aortic arch replacement for traumatic aortic injury.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Santo, K. C., Barrios, A., Dandekar, U., Riley, P., Guest, P., Bonser, R. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Monitoring (Cardiac), Technology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31818042d6</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Near-Infrared Spectroscopy: An Important Monitoring Tool During Hybrid Aortic Arch Replacement]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>796</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>793</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CARDIOVASCULAR ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/799?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Somatosensory Evoked Potentials by Median Nerve Stimulation in Children During Thiopental/Sevoflurane Anesthesia and the Additive Effects of Ketoprofen and Fentanyl]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/799?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are used to determine the spinal cord and brain function during surgical procedures. In general, SEPs are sensitive to volatile anesthetics, but little is known about the effects of anesthesia maintenance with sevoflurane on SEPs in children. Analgesics are often provided during anesthesia, and supplementary drugs may also affect the SEPs. In this prospective clinical trial of 27 healthy, 3- to 8-yr-old children, we evaluated the effects of sevoflurane anesthesia after IV induction with benzodiazepine and barbiturate on median nerve SEP. In addition, the effects of two analgesics (ketoprofen and fentanyl) on SEPs were evaluated.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Median nerve SEPs were recorded before premedication with midazolam 0.1 mg/kg IV, and at three separate times during anesthesia maintenance with sevoflurane 2% end-tidal concentration in air/oxygen (after 15 min of sevoflurane inhalation), supplemented with/without ketoprofen 1 mg/kg (after 25 min) and fentanyl 1 &micro;g/kg (after 35 min).</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Compared with baseline measurements, an increase both in N20 latency (<I>P</I> = 0.015) and in central conduction time (<I>P</I> = 0.001) was noted during anesthesia maintenance with sevoflurane. The administration of analgesics did not have an influence on the N20 latency or central conduction time. In children 5 to 8 yr of age, the mean cortical N20-P25 amplitude was decreased (<I>P</I> = 0.008). In addition, in older children, the N20-P25 amplitude decreased after the co-administration of ketoprofen and fentanyl compared with the values measured before the analgesics (<I>P</I> = 0.03). These decreases were not seen in the younger children.</p>
<p><b>DISCUSSION: </b> In children, anesthesia maintenance with 2% sevoflurane prolongs median SEP latencies in a manner that is similar to those reported for other volatile anesthetics. However, SEP monitoring can be done with sevoflurane inhalation, but the dosage should be adjusted due to interindividual variabilty. Co-administration of ketoprofen, and fentanyl did not affect the SEP latencies, but <I>post hoc</I> analysis suggested that older children had a decrease in cortical amplitudes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Westeren-Punnonen, S., Ypparila-Wolters, H., Partanen, J., Nieminen, K., Hyvarinen, A., Kokki, H.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Neuroanesthesia, Monitoring (Non-cardiac), Clinical Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f0f07</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Somatosensory Evoked Potentials by Median Nerve Stimulation in Children During Thiopental/Sevoflurane Anesthesia and the Additive Effects of Ketoprofen and Fentanyl]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>805</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>799</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/806?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Effect of Propofol Concentration on Dispersion of Myocardial Repolarization in Children]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/806?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> QT interval prolongation on the electrocardiogram (ECG) may be drug-induced and is traditionally associated with torsades des pointes. A better predictor of torsades des pointes is the time interval between the peak and the end of the T-wave (Tp-e). Older studies of propofol&rsquo;s effect on the corrected interval (QTc) are conflicting and confounded by polypharmacy. It was recently shown that target-controlled infusion of propofol at 3 &micro;g/mL has no effect on QTc or Tp-e. This plasma concentration of propofol is at the extreme lower end of the range for surgical anesthesia. In this randomized, double-blind, clinical study, we investigated the dose&ndash;response relationship between propofol, QTc, and Tp-e in a range of doses clinically relevant for surgical anesthesia.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Sixty healthy unpremedicated children, aged 3&ndash;10 yr, were recruited. Subjects were randomized to receive target-controlled infusions of propofol, to achieve 1 of 3 plasma concentrations: 3, 4.5, and 6 &micro;g/mL. A preoperative 12 lead ECG was performed and repeated 5 min after induction. Two investigators, blinded to group allocation and to the timing of the ECG traces, independently measured QTc and Tp-e within and between each group. Paired <I>t</I>-tests were used to compare QTc and Tp-e within groups. One-way analysis of variance was used for intergroup analysis. The primary outcome measure was a change of &gt;25 ms in Tp-e both within and between groups.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> ECG recordings were obtained in 51 children. There were no demographic or ECG differences at baseline, at which time QTc and Tp-e values were within normal limits. There were no differences in QTc or Tp-e after induction within or between the three different groups.</p>
<p><b>DISCUSSION: </b> Propofol has no effect on myocardial repolarization in healthy children at clinically relevant doses. This suggests that propofol would be a rational choice for children with a preexisting repolarization abnormality.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Hume-Smith, H. V., Sanatani, S., Lim, J., Chau, A., Whyte, S. D.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Heart, Clinical Pharmacology, Pediatrics, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181815ce3</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Effect of Propofol Concentration on Dispersion of Myocardial Repolarization in Children]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>810</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>806</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/811?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Extra-1 Acupressure for Children Undergoing Anesthesia]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/811?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Acupuncture and related techniques have been used as adjuncts for perioperative anesthesia management. We examined whether acupressure in the Extra-1 (Yin-Tang) point would result in decreased preprocedural anxiety and reduced intraprocedural propofol requirements in a group of children undergoing endoscopic procedures.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Fifty-two children were randomized to receive acupressure bead intervention either at the Extra-1 acupuncture point or at a sham point. A Bispectral Index (BIS) monitor was applied to all children before the onset of the intervention. Anxiety was assessed at baseline and before entrance to the operating room. Anesthetic techniques were standardized and maintained with IV propofol infusion titrated to keep BIS values of 40&ndash;60.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> We found that after the intervention, children in the Extra-1 group experienced reduced anxiety whereas children in the sham group experienced increased anxiety (&ndash;9% [&ndash;3 to &ndash;15] vs 2% [&ndash;6 to 7.4], <I>P</I> = 0.012). In contrast, no significant changes in BIS values were observed in the preprocedural waiting period between groups (<I>P</I> = ns). We also found that total intraprocedural propofol requirements did not differ between the two study groups (214 &plusmn; 76 &micro;g &middot; kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> &middot; min<sup>&ndash;1</sup> vs 229 &plusmn; 95 &micro;g &middot; kg<sup>&ndash;1</sup> &middot; min<sup>&ndash;1</sup>, <I>P</I> = 0.52).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> We conclude that acupressure bead intervention at Extra-1 acupoint reduces preprocedural anxiety in children undergoing endoscopic procedures. This intervention, however, has no impact on BIS values or intraprocedural propofol requirements.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Wang, S.-M., Escalera, S., Lin, E. C., Maranets, I., Kain, Z. N.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Alternative Medicine, Pediatrics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181804441</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Extra-1 Acupressure for Children Undergoing Anesthesia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>816</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>811</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PEDIATRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/818?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Dose-Response of Nitrous Oxide in Postoperative Nausea in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Preliminary Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/818?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Whether nitrous oxide (N<SUB>2</SUB>O) increases the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) after laparoscopic gynecologic surgery is still controversial, which may be due to the administration of different concentrations of inspired N<SUB>2</SUB>O. We investigated whether N<SUB>2</SUB>O results in a dose&ndash;response increase in PONV.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Patients undergoing gynecologic laparoscopic surgery were randomized to receive 30% oxygen with air (G0, <I>n</I> = 46), 50% N<SUB>2</SUB>O with oxygen (G50, <I>n</I> = 46), or 70% N<SUB>2</SUB>O with oxygen (G70, <I>n</I> = 45). A standardized general anesthetic was used with no PONV prophylaxis. Known risk factors for PONV were controlled. Metoclopramide was used as a rescue antiemetic. The incidence of nausea, vomiting, use of rescue antiemetic, and pain visual analog scale (VAS) score was measured at 2 and 24 h postoperatively.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Patient demographics were comparable, and there were no differences among groups regarding factors that may influence PONV. The incidence of PONV at 24 h was 33% (15 of 46) in the G0 group, 46% (21 of 46) in the G50 group, and 62% (28 of 45) in the G70 group (<I>P</I> = 0.018). Subgroup analysis revealed a difference between G0 versus G70 groups (<I>P</I> = 0.018), but no significant difference between G0 versus G50 groups and G50 versus G70 groups. The incidence of nausea showed a similar difference (G0 = 26%, G50 = 35%, and G70 = 56%; <I>P</I> = 0.012), but the incidence of vomiting was not different among the groups although there was a trend (G0 = 28%, G50 = 35%, and G70 = 42%; <I>P</I> = 0.377). The severity of nausea (measured by VAS 100 mm) was significantly increased with increasing N<SUB>2</SUB>O concentration (G0 = 10.9, G50 = 12.7, and G70 = 20.5; <I>P</I> = 0.027). The highest VAS score during 24 h was used for the analysis. There was no difference in the use of a rescue antiemetic among groups. Pain VAS scores and opioids consumption were not different among groups (at 2 and 24 h after surgery).</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> N<SUB>2</SUB>O increases the incidence of postoperative nausea after gynecologic laparoscopic surgery. This preliminary finding indicates that N<SUB>2</SUB>O may increase PONV in a dose-dependent fashion. A study with a sample size of &gt;400 patients in each group would be necessary to demonstrate a statistically significant difference among each of these three groups. We do not recommend using a high concentration of N<SUB>2</SUB>O in this clinical setting.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mraovic, B., Simurina, T., Sonicki, Z., Skitarelic, N., Gan, T. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Ambulatory, Postanesthetic Care Unit, Complications, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e318181f4aa</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Dose-Response of Nitrous Oxide in Postoperative Nausea in Patients Undergoing Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery: A Preliminary Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>823</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>818</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>AMBULATORY ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/824?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[The Duration of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Mixed with Lidocaine]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/824?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Although spinal bupivacaine may have too long duration to be useful in the ambulatory setting, recent animal data suggest that lidocaine added to spinal bupivacaine may reduce the duration of bupivacaine spinal anesthesia. We explored whether lidocaine added to spinal bupivacaine could shorten the duration of bupivacaine spinal anesthesia in humans similarly to what has been reported in animals.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Ninety patients presenting for transurethral resection of bladder tumor or prostate were assigned to one of three groups by double blind randomization to receive intrathecal 1.5 mL of hyperbaric 0.5% bupivacaine, plus 0.6 mL of one of three solutions: saline (Group I, <I>n</I> = 30, control), 1% lidocaine (Group II, <I>n</I> = 30), and 2% lidocaine (Group III, <I>n</I> = 30). Peak sensory block level, time to peak sensory block, times to two-segment, L1, and S2 regressions from peak sensory block, motor blocks at peak sensory block, L1, and S2 regressions, and postanesthesia care unit stay time (PACU time) were measured.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Times to peak sensory block were similar in all three groups. Times to two-segment, L1, and S2 regressions from peak sensory block, and PACU time were significantly reduced in Group II compared to Group I. Times to L1, S2 regressions, and PACU times in Group III were significantly prolonged.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> We conclude that lidocaine (6 mg) mixed to spinal bupivacaine (7.5 mg) can shorten the duration of bupivacaine spinal anesthesia, therefore provide more rapid recovery from the spinal anesthesia compared to the same dose of bupivacaine (7.5 mg) alone.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lee, S.-J., Bai, S.-J., Lee, J.-S., Kim, W.-O., Shin, Y.-S., Lee, K.-Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Ambulatory, Anesthetic Techniques, Clinical Pharmacology, Regional Anesthesia, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181806149</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[The Duration of Intrathecal Bupivacaine Mixed with Lidocaine]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>827</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>824</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>AMBULATORY ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/832?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility?]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/832?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>A paradox arises from present information concerning the mechanism(s) by which inhaled anesthetics produce immobility in the face of noxious stimulation. Several findings, such as additivity, suggest a common site at which inhaled anesthetics act to produce immobility. However, two decades of focused investigation have not identified a ligand- or voltage-gated channel that alone is sufficient to mediate immobility. Indeed, most putative targets provide minimal or no mediation. For example, opioid, 5-HT3, -aminobutyric acid type A and glutamate receptors, and potassium and calcium channels appear to be irrelevant or play only minor roles. Furthermore, no combination of actions on ligand- or voltage-gated channels seems sufficient. A few plausible targets (e.g., sodium channels) merit further study, but there remains the possibility that immobilization results from a nonspecific mechanism.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eger, E. I., Raines, D. E., Shafer, S. L., Hemmings, H. C., Sonner, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Preclinical Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e318182aedb</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Is a New Paradigm Needed to Explain How Inhaled Anesthetics Produce Immobility?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>848</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>832</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/849?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Hypothesis on the Origin and Evolution of the Response to Inhaled Anesthetics]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/849?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>In this article, I present an evolutionary explanation for why organisms respond to inhaled anesthetics. It is conjectured that organisms today respond to inhaled anesthetics owing to the sensitivity of ion channels to inhaled anesthetics, which in turn has arisen by common descent from ancestral, anesthetic-sensitive ion channels in one-celled organisms (i.e., that the response to anesthetics did not arise as an adaptation of the nervous system, but rather of ion channels that preceded the origin of multicellularity). This sensitivity may have been refined by continuing selection at synapses in multicellular organisms.</p>
<p>In particular, it is hypothesized that 1) the beneficial trait that was selected for in one-celled organisms was the coordinated response of ion channels to compounds that were present in the environment, which influenced the conformational equilibrium of ion channels; 2) this coordinated response prevented the deleterious consequences of entry of positive charges into the cell, thereby increasing the fitness of the organism; and 3) these compounds (which may have included organic anions, cations, and zwitterions as well as uncharged compounds) mimicked inhaled anesthetics in that they were interfacially active, and modulated ion channel function by altering bilayer properties coupled to channel function.</p>
<p>The proposed hypothesis is consistent with known properties of inhaled anesthetics. In addition, it leads to testable experimental predictions of nonvolatile compounds having anesthetic-like modulatory effects on ion channels and in animals, including endogenous compounds that may modulate ion channel function in health and disease. The latter included metabolites that are increased in some types of end-stage organ failure, and genetic metabolic diseases. Several of these predictions have been tested and proved to be correct.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sonner, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Preclinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ee684</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Hypothesis on the Origin and Evolution of the Response to Inhaled Anesthetics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>854</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>849</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/855?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Genetics and the Evolution of the Anesthetic Response]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/855?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sedensky, M. M., Morgan, P. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Preclinical Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817d864a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Genetics and the Evolution of the Anesthetic Response]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>858</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>855</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/859?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Why Can All of Biology Be Anesthetized?]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/859?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Eckenhoff, R. G.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Preclinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ee7ee</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Why Can All of Biology Be Anesthetized?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>861</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>859</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/862?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Does Natural Selection Explain the Universal Response of Metazoans to Volatile Anesthetics?]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/862?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Crowder, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Genetics, Preclinical Pharmacology, Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817d866a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Does Natural Selection Explain the Universal Response of Metazoans to Volatile Anesthetics?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>863</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>862</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/864?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Meyer and Overton Revisited]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/864?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lynch, C.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181706c7e</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Meyer and Overton Revisited]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>867</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>864</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/868?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Anesthetic-Like Modulation of Receptor Function by Surfactants: A Test of the Interfacial Theory of Anesthesia]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/868?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>INTRODUCTION: </b> Inhaled anesthetics are interfacially active, concentrating at interfaces such as the protein/water or bilayer/water interfaces. We tested the hypothesis that interfacial activity was a sufficient condition for anesthetic-like modulation of receptor function by applying surfactants to -aminobutyric acid type A (GABA<SUB>A</SUB>), glycine, and <I>N</I>-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA) receptors. We defined anesthetic-like modulation as an increase in currents through native channels that isoflurane and ethanol increased currents through, and a decrease in currents through channels that isoflurane and ethanol decreased currents through. We also tested the null hypothesis that there would be no difference in modulation of channel currents by surfactants in receptors with point mutations that diminished their response to isoflurane and ethanol compared to the native version of these receptors.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> The effect of seven surfactants with different head group charges (anionic, cationic, zwitterionic, and uncharged) and tail lengths (8 carbons and 12 carbons) on homomeric wild type 1 and mutant <SUB>1</SUB> (S267I) glycine receptors, wild type <SUB>1</SUB>&beta;<SUB>2</SUB><SUB>2s</SUB> and mutant <SUB>1</SUB>(S270I)&beta;<SUB>2</SUB><SUB>2s</SUB> GABA<SUB>A</SUB> receptors, and wild type NR1/NR2A and mutant NR1(F639A)/NR2A NMDA receptors was studied. Receptors were expressed in <I>Xenopus laevis</I> oocytes and studied using two-electrode voltage clamping.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> All seven surfactants, isoflurane, and ethanol enhanced GABA<SUB>A</SUB> receptor function. Six of seven surfactants, isoflurane, and ethanol enhanced glycine receptor function. Six of seven surfactants, isoflurane, and ethanol inhibited NMDA receptor function. For the mutant receptors, five of seven surfactants increased currents through GABA<SUB>A</SUB> receptors, whereas six of seven surfactants increased currents through glycine receptors. Six of seven surfactants decreased currents through the NMDA receptor. In contrast to isoflurane and ethanol, surfactants as a group did not diminish modulation of mutant compared to wild type receptors.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSION: </b> These findings identify another large class of compounds (surfactants) that modulate the function of GABA<SUB>A</SUB>, glycine, and NMDA receptors in a manner that is qualitatively similar to inhaled anesthetics. We cannot reject the hypothesis that interfacial activity is a sufficient condition for anesthetic-like modulation of these receptors. Mutations that diminish the modulatory effect of isoflurane and ethanol did not diminish the modulatory effect of the surfactants.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yang, L., Sonner, J. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Preclinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ee500</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Anesthetic-Like Modulation of Receptor Function by Surfactants: A Test of the Interfacial Theory of Anesthesia]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>874</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>868</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/875?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Intrathecal Veratridine Administration Increases Minimum Alveolar Concentration in Rats]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/875?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Results from several studies point to sodium channels as potential mediators of the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics. We hypothesized that the intrathecal administration of veratridine, a drug that enhances the activity or effect of sodium channels, should increase MAC.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> We measured the change in isoflurane MAC caused by intrathecal infusion of various concentrations of veratridine into the lumbothoracic subarachnoid space of rats. We compared these result with those obtained from intracerebroventricular infusion.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> As predicted, intrathecal infusion of veratridine increased MAC. The greatest infused concentration (25 &micro;M) also produced neuronal injury in the hindlimbs of two rats and decreased the peak effect on MAC. A concentration of 1.6 &micro;M produced the largest (21%) increase in MAC. Intraventricular infusion of 1.6 and 6.4 &micro;M veratridine did not alter MAC. Rats given 25 &micro;M died.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> Intrathecal administration of veratradine increases MAC of isoflurane, a finding consistent with a role for sodium channels as potential mediators of the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zhang, Y., Sharma, M., Eger, E. I., Laster, M. J., Hemmings, H. C., Harris, R. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Preclinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181815fbc</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Intrathecal Veratridine Administration Increases Minimum Alveolar Concentration in Rats]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>878</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>875</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/879?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Increases in Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid Potassium Concentration Do Not Increase Isoflurane Minimum Alveolar Concentration in Rats]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/879?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Previous studies demonstrated that MAC for isoflurane directly correlates with the concentration of Na<sup>+</sup> in cerebrospinal fluid surrounding the spinal cord, the primary site for mediation of the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics. If this correlation resulted from increased irritability of the cord, then infusion of increased concentrations of potassium (K<sup>+</sup>) might be predicted to act similarly. However, an absence of effect of K<sup>+</sup> might be interpreted to indicate that K<sup>+</sup> channels do not mediate the immobility produced by inhaled anesthetics whereas Na<sup>+</sup> channels remain as potential mediators. Accordingly, in the present study, we examined the effect of altering intrathecal concentrations of K<sup>+</sup> on MAC.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> In rats prepared with chronic indwelling intrathecal catheters, we infused solutions deficient in K<sup>+</sup> and with an excess of K<sup>+</sup> into the lumbar space and measured MAC for isoflurane 24 h before, during, and 24 h after infusion. Rats similarly prepared were tested for the effect of altered osmolarity on MAC (accomplished by infusion of mannitol) and for the penetration of Na<sup>+</sup> into the cord.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> MAC of isoflurane never significantly increased with increasing concentrations of K<sup>+</sup> infused intrathecally. At infused concentrations exceeding 12 times the normal concentration of KCl, i.e., 29 mEq/L, rats moved spontaneously at isoflurane concentrations just below, and sometimes at MAC, but the average MAC in these rats did not exceed their control MAC. At the largest infused concentration (58.1 mEq/L), MAC significantly decreased and did not subsequently return to normal (i.e., such large concentrations produced injury). Infusions of lower concentrations of K<sup>+</sup> had no effect on MAC. Infusion of osmotically equivalent solutions of mannitol did not affect MAC. Na<sup>+</sup> infused intrathecally measurably penetrated the spinal cord.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> The results do not support a mediation or modulation of MAC by K<sup>+</sup> channels.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Shnayderman, D., Laster, M. J., Eger, E. I., Oh, I., Zhang, Y., Jinks, S. L., Antognini, J. F., Raines, D. E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Preclinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181815f2b</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Increases in Spinal Cerebrospinal Fluid Potassium Concentration Do Not Increase Isoflurane Minimum Alveolar Concentration in Rats]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>884</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>879</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/885?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Isoflurane Prevents Nicotine-Evoked Norepinephrine Release from the Mouse Spinal Cord at Low Clinical Concentrations]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/885?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Volatile anesthetics inhibit nicotinic acetylcholine receptors at subanesthetic concentrations. In both animal and human studies, similar concentrations of volatile anesthetics have been associated with increased sensitivity to pain. Nicotinic analgesia is thought to involve the enhanced release of norepinephrine. These studies are intended as a "proof of concept" that alteration of the nicotinic facilitation of norepinephrine release is a potential mechanism for isoflurane-induced pronociception.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> We conducted our study using a murine lumbar spinal cord slice model. We evoked norepinephrine release with nicotine in the presence and absence of isoflurane. To identify the type of nicotinic receptor involved, we studied the effect of receptor and subtype-specific ligands and genetically engineered mice, which lacked the gene expression for the nicotinic &beta;2 subunit. The amount of [<sup>3</sup>H]-norepinephrine released was measured under the different conditions.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Nicotine-facilitated norepinephrine release was significantly and maximally inhibited by isoflurane at concentrations that enhance pain sensitivity <I>in vivo</I> (0.38%). Facilitation of norepinephrine release was mimicked by the 7 selective agonist choline and inhibited in the presence of -bungarotoxin, an 7-nicotinic selective antagonist. Facilitation of norepinephrine release was not different in animals lacking &beta;2 subunits compared with matched controls.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> Nicotinic facilitation of norepinephrine release in the spinal cord is inhibited by isoflurane at low clinically relevant concentrations. Because the net effect of noradrenergic tone in the spinal cord is inhibitory, the removal of this mechanism might be responsible for the enhanced pain sensitivity seen at these concentrations of isoflurane.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rowley, T. J., Flood, P.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Mechanisms, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/01.ane.0000287646.85834.1a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Isoflurane Prevents Nicotine-Evoked Norepinephrine Release from the Mouse Spinal Cord at Low Clinical Concentrations]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>889</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>885</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ANESTHETIC PHARMACOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/890?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Infrared Measurement of Carbon Dioxide in the Human Breath: "Breathe-Through" Devices from Tyndall to the Present Day]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/890?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>The ability to measure carbon dioxide (CO<SUB>2</SUB>) in the breath of a patient or capnometry, is one of the fundamental technological advances of modern medicine. I will chronicle the evolution and commercialization of mainstream capnometry based upon infrared measurement of CO<SUB>2</SUB> in the breath using information from the historical record and personal interviews with many of the developers.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jaffe, M. B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[History, Monitoring (Non-cardiac), Technology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817ee3b3</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Infrared Measurement of Carbon Dioxide in the Human Breath: "Breathe-Through" Devices from Tyndall to the Present Day]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>904</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>890</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/905?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[A Pilot Study of Neonatal and Pediatric Esophageal Pulse Oximetry]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/905?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> In this pilot study we explored the suitability of the esophagus as a new measuring site for blood oxygen saturation (Spo<SUB>2</SUB>) in neonates.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> A new miniaturized esophageal pulse oximeter has been developed. Five patients (one child and four neonates) were studied.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Spo<SUB>2</SUB> values were obtained in the esophagus of all patients. A Bland and Altman plot of the difference between Spo<SUB>2</SUB> values from the esophageal pulse oximeter and a commercial toe pulse oximeter against their mean showed that the bias and the limits of agreement between the two pulse oximeters were +0.3% and +1.7% to &ndash;1.0%, respectively.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> This study suggests that the esophagus can be used as an alternative site for monitoring blood oxygen saturation in children and neonates.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kyriacou, P. A., Jones, D. P., Langford, R. M., Petros, A. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Monitoring (Non-cardiac), Pediatrics, Technology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817e67d1</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[A Pilot Study of Neonatal and Pediatric Esophageal Pulse Oximetry]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>908</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>905</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>TECHNOLOGY, COMPUTING, AND SIMULATION</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/909?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An In-Vivo Metabolic Test for Detecting Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility in Humans: A Pilot Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/909?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>INTRODUCTION: </b> <I>In vitro</I> contracture testing to diagnose malignant hyperthermia (MH) susceptibility requires a muscle biopsy, which may be associated with severe side effects for the patient. After investigation of several different protocols, we present a less invasive metabolic test that involves IM injection of caffeine and halothane, and subsequent measurement of interstitial lactate to differentiate between MH susceptible (MHS) and MH non-susceptible (MHN) individuals.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Two microdialysis probes with attached microtubing for trigger injection were inserted into the lateral vastus muscle of eight previously diagnosed MHS patients (representing three genetic variants Gly2434Arg, Thr2206Met, and Arg614Cys), seven MHN patients, and seven control individuals. After equilibration and lactate baseline recording, a single bolus of 200 &micro;L caffeine 80 mM and a suspension of 200 &micro;L halothane 4%V/V in soy bean oil (triggers) were injected locally. Lactate was measured spectrophotometrically. Data are presented as medians and interquartile ranges.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Although baseline lactate values were similar in the investigated groups before trigger injection, caffeine increased local lactate in MHS patients significantly more (2.0 [1.8&ndash;2.6] mM) than in MHN (0.8 [0.6&ndash;1.1] mM) or in control individuals (0.8 [0.6&ndash;0.8 mM]). Similarly, halothane lead to a significant lactate increase in MHS compared to MHN and control individuals (8.6 [3.7&ndash;8.9] mM vs 0.9 [0.5&ndash;1.1] mM and 1.7 [0.9&ndash;2.3] mM, respectively). However, a relevant increase of lactate was observed in one MHN and in two control individuals. Systemic hemodynamic and metabolic variables did not differ between the investigated groups.</p>
<p><b>DISCUSSION: </b> Metabolic monitoring of IM lactate after local caffeine and halothane injection may allow less invasive testing to detect MH susceptibility, without systemic side effects.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schuster, F., Metterlein, T., Negele, S., Kranke, P., Muellenbach, R. M., Schwemmer, U., Roewer, N., Anetseder, M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Preoperative Evaluation, Patient Safety, Genetics]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817e60b5</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An In-Vivo Metabolic Test for Detecting Malignant Hyperthermia Susceptibility in Humans: A Pilot Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>914</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>909</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PATIENT SAFETY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/915?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Patients with Difficult Intubation May Need Referral to Sleep Clinics]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/915?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>PURPOSE: </b> Upper airway abnormalities carry the risk of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and difficult tracheal intubations. Both conditions contribute to significant clinical problems and have increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. We hypothesized that patients who presented with difficult intubation would have a very high prevalence of OSA and that those with unexpected difficult intubation may require referral to sleep clinics for polysomnography (PSG).</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Patients classified as a grade 4 Cormack and Lehane on direct laryngoscopic view, and who required more than two attempts for successful endotracheal intubation, were referred to the study by consultant anesthesiologists at four hospitals. Apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) data and postoperative events were collected. Patients with AHI &gt;5/h were considered positive for OSA. Clinical and PSG variables were compared using <I>t</I>-tests and <sup>2</sup> test.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Over a 20-mo period, 84 patients with a difficult intubation were referred into the study. Thirty-three patients agreed to participate. Sixty-six percent (22 of 33) had OSA (AHI &gt;5/h). Of the 22 OSA patients, 10 patients (64%) had mild OSA (AHI 5&ndash;15), 6 (18%) had moderate OSA (AHI &gt;15/h), and 6 (18%) had severe OSA (AHI &gt;30/h). Of the 33 patients, 11 patients (33%) were recommended for continuous positive airway pressure treatment. Between the OSA group and the non-OSA group, there were significant differences in gender, neck size, and the quality of sleep, but there were no significant differences in age and body mass index.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> Sixty-six percent of patients with unexpected difficult intubation who consented to undergo a sleep study were diagnosed with OSA by PSG. Patients with difficult intubation are at high risk for OSA and should be screened for signs and symptoms of sleep apnea. Screening for OSA should be considered by referral to a sleep clinic for PSG.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chung, F., Yegneswaran, B., Herrera, F., Shenderey, A., Shapiro, C. M.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Ambulatory, Airway, Preoperative Evaluation, Patient Safety]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817bd36f</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Patients with Difficult Intubation May Need Referral to Sleep Clinics]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>920</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>915</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PATIENT SAFETY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/921?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Transurethral Resection Syndrome Detected and Managed Using Transesophageal Doppler]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/921?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Transurethral resection syndrome during transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) results from excessive absorption of electrolyte-free irrigation fluids causing acute hypervolemia and hyponatremia. Neuraxial anesthesia is often recommended for TURP procedures because early signs of neurological deterioration can be detected. However, in patients requiring general anesthesia, other continuous and noninvasive measures are needed. Acute intravascular hypervolemia should be reflected by changes in hemodynamic values. Transesophageal Doppler ultrasonography of the aorta allows determination of stroke volume and other advanced hemodynamic variables related to intravascular volume status. We describe the first case of intraoperative detection of a TURP syndrome by noninvasive Doppler monitoring of hemodynamic variables during TURP.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Schober, P., Meuleman, E. J.H., Boer, C., Loer, S. A., Schwarte, L. A.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Cardiovascular, Complications, Patient Safety, Technology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817b84f4</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Transurethral Resection Syndrome Detected and Managed Using Transesophageal Doppler]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>925</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>921</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PATIENT SAFETY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/926?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Respiratory Depression with Tramadol in a Patient with Renal Impairment and CYP2D6 Gene Duplication]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/926?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We observed opioid-related respiratory depression in a patient receiving tramadol via patient-controlled analgesia. Predisposing factors were the patient's genetic background and renal impairment. Complete recovery occurred after naloxone administration, thus confirming opioid intoxication. Analysis of the patient's genotype revealed a CYP2D6 gene duplication resulting in ultra-rapid metabolism of tramadol to its active metabolite (+)<I>O</I>-desmethyltramadol. Concomitant renal impairment resulting in decreased metabolite clearance enhanced opioid toxicity. This genetic CYP2D6 variant is particularly common in specific ethnic populations and should be a future diagnostic target whenever administration of tramadol or codeine is anticipated, as both drugs are subject to a comparable CYP2D6-dependent metabolism.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stamer, U. M., Stuber, F., Muders, T., Musshoff, F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Complications, Patient Safety, Genetics, Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817b796e</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Respiratory Depression with Tramadol in a Patient with Renal Impairment and CYP2D6 Gene Duplication]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>929</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>926</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>PATIENT SAFETY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/932?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Determinants of Tidal Volumes with Adaptive Support Ventilation: A Multicenter Observational Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/932?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>INTRODUCTION: </b> In the present study, we investigated the behavior of adaptive support ventilation (ASV) in patients after cardiothoracic surgery. We determined tidal volumes (Vt) and factors that influence Vt with this mode of microprocessor-controlled mechanical ventilation (MV).</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> This was a prospective, multicenter, observational study in three Dutch intensive care units over a 5-mo period. MV data were collected during steady-state after arrival in the intensive care unit.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Data were collected for 346 consecutive patients after cardiothoracic surgery: 262 patients weaned with ASV, and 84 patients weaned with pressure-controlled/pressure-support MV. With ASV the mean (&plusmn; sd) Vt expressed per kilogram actual body weight was 7.1 &plusmn; 1.6 mL. Expressed per kilogram ideal body weight (IBW), Vt was 8.3 &plusmn; 1.5 mL. In patients with a correctly set body weight (SBW) (i.e., the IBW), Vt was 8.1 &plusmn; 1.4 mL/kg. With pressure-controlled/pressure-support-MV Vt was 7.3 &plusmn; 1.4 mL/kg IBW (<I>P</I> &lt; 0.001 vs ASV). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed Vt with ASV to be dependent on only two parameters: respiratory rate and the correctness of SBW.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> Vt with ASV seems to be dependent on two parameters: respiratory rate and the correctness of SBW. The first factor is not clinically important because respiratory rate is automatically chosen by the microprocessor. The second factor is clinically important because it is the only factor that can be influenced by the operator. Our data show the importance of setting the correct weight with ASV. With ASV, Vt are &gt;8 mL/kg IBW in a substantial number of patients. Randomized clinical trials should be performed to compare ASV with other ventilation modes.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dongelmans, D. A., Veelo, D. P., Bindels, A., Binnekade, J. M., Koppenol, K., Koopmans, M., Korevaar, J. C., Kuiper, M. A., Schultz, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Critical Care, Ventilation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f1dcf</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Determinants of Tidal Volumes with Adaptive Support Ventilation: A Multicenter Observational Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>937</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>932</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/938?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Adaptive Support Ventilation with Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheotomy: A Clinical Study]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/938?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>We determined the need for changes in minute ventilation with adaptive support ventilation after percutaneous dilatational tracheotomy under endoscopic guidance in 34 intensive care unit patients. During the procedure, minute ventilation was not changed; only maximum pressure limits were adjusted, if necessary. After insertion of the tracheotomy, cannula minute ventilation was adjusted only if Paco<SUB>2</SUB>-values changed &ge;0.5 kPa from baseline. In 74% of patients, adaptive support ventilation was unable to maintain minute ventilation during the use of the endoscope, mandating pressure limitation adjustments. In a minority of patients (26%), minute ventilation had to be adjusted to achieve similar Paco<SUB>2</SUB> values.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Veelo, D. P., Dongelmans, D. A., Middelhoek, P., Korevaar, J. C., Schultz, M. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Critical Care, Economics and Health Care Research, Ventilation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f0e06</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Adaptive Support Ventilation with Percutaneous Dilatational Tracheotomy: A Clinical Study]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>940</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>938</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/941?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Functional Residual Capacity Changes After Different Endotracheal Suctioning Methods]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/941?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Our primary objective was to investigate the effects of three different endotracheal suctioning procedures on functional residual capacity (FRC).</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Using a crossover design, postoperative cardiac surgery patients (<I>n</I> = 20) received three different suctioning methods in randomized order: closed suctioning during pressure-controlled ventilation, closed suctioning during volume-controlled ventilation, and open suctioning. FRC was measured before and 20 min after the intervention.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: </b> FRC is reduced in postcardiac surgery patients after suctioning, regardless of which method is used. Certain patients may have very pronounced changes of FRC. Routine FRC measurements could complement respiratory monitoring to optimize respiratory therapy.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Heinze, H., Sedemund-Adib, B., Heringlake, M., Gosch, U. W., Eichler, W.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Critical Care, Ventilation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181804a5d</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Functional Residual Capacity Changes After Different Endotracheal Suctioning Methods]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>944</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>941</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/945?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Acute Pulmonary Artery Embolism During Transcatheter Embolization: Successful Resuscitation with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/945?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Versatile particles from transcatheter embolization may accidentally enter the pulmonary circulation, causing severe pulmonary embolism. A 36-yr-old woman patient suffering from an arteriovenous malformation in the left shoulder underwent embolization with micro coils, <I>N</I>-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate/lipiodol and polyvinyl alcohol particles. During embolization, acute onset of tachycardia, hypotension, and decline in oxygen saturation indicated right ventricular failure and decreased pulmonary perfusion confirmed by angiography. As mechanical resuscitation failed to stabilize cardiocirculatory function, veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support was preformed until hemodynamic stability was regained. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation should be considered for cases where pulmonary embolism causes right ventricular failure and circulatory arrest during transcatheter embolization.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Haller, I., Kofler, A., Lederer, W., Chemelli, A., Wiedermann, F. J.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Critical Care, Resuscitation, Complications, Coagulation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f91d8</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Acute Pulmonary Artery Embolism During Transcatheter Embolization: Successful Resuscitation with Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>947</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>945</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>CRITICAL CARE AND TRAUMA</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/948?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[An Evaluation of the Postoperative Antihyperalgesic and Analgesic Effects of Intrathecal Clonidine Administered During Elective Cesarean Delivery]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/948?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Intrathecal clonidine improves intraoperative anesthesia and postoperative analgesia after cesarean delivery. Clonidine also possesses antihyperalgesic properties. Hyperalgesia contributes to postoperative pain and may be associated with increased risk of chronic pain after surgery. In this study, we evaluated the postoperative antihyperalgesic effect of intrathecal clonidine after caesarean delivery.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Ninety-six parturients undergoing elective cesarean delivery were randomly assigned to receive intrathecal bupivacaine-sufentanil (BS group), bupivacaine-sufentanil-clonidine 75 &micro;g (BSC group), or bupivacaine-clonidine 150 &micro;g (BC group). The primary outcome was the extent and the incidence of periincisional punctate mechanical hyperalgesia as assessed by response to application of a von Frey filament at 24 and 48 h after cesarean delivery. Postoperative morphine requirements and pain scores, as well as residual pain at 1, 3, and 6 mo, were also assessed.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> The BC group had a significantly reduced area of periincisional hyperalgesia at 48 h (median, 25th&ndash;75th percentiles): 1.0 (1.0 &ndash; 3.3) cm<sup>2</sup> vs 9.5 (5.0&ndash;14.0) cm<sup>2</sup> in the BS group vs 5.0 (2.5&ndash;12.3) cm<sup>2</sup> in the BSC group (<I>P</I> = 0.02 with the BS group). The incidence of hyperalgesia at 48 h was also lower in the BC group: 16% vs 41% in the BS group vs 34% in the BSC group (<I>P</I> = 0.03 with BS group). Postoperative morphine consumption, pain scores, and incidence and intensity of residual pain did not differ among groups.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> Intrathecal clonidine 150 &micro;g combined with bupivacaine had a postoperative antihyperalgesic effect expressed as a significant reduction in the extent and incidence of periincisional punctate mechanical hyperalgesia at 48 h after elective cesarean delivery compared with intrathecal bupivacaine-sufentanil and intrathecal clonidine 75 &micro;g-bupivacaine-sufentanil.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Lavand'homme, P. M., Roelants, F., Waterloos, H., Collet, V., De Kock, M. F.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Obstetrics, Pain Mechanisms, Pain Medicine, Regional Anesthesia, Pain, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f1595</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[An Evaluation of the Postoperative Antihyperalgesic and Analgesic Effects of Intrathecal Clonidine Administered During Elective Cesarean Delivery]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>955</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>948</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/956?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Respiratory Depression After Neuraxial Opioids in the Obstetric Setting]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/956?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Neuraxial opioids have contributed significantly to improved labor and postcesarean delivery analgesia. In the obstetric population, epidural and intrathecal opioids are associated with a very low risk of clinically significant respiratory depression. Although rare, respiratory depression is a serious risk; patients may die or suffer permanent brain damage as a consequence. This review discusses the mechanism and incidence, as well as the prevention, detection, and management of respiratory depression with morphine, extended-release epidural morphine, and lipophilic opioids in the labor and cesarean delivery setting.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carvalho, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Obstetrics, Complications, Pharmacology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e318168b443</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Respiratory Depression After Neuraxial Opioids in the Obstetric Setting]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>961</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>956</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/962?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Successful Placement of a Right Ventricular Assist Device for Treatment of a Presumed Amniotic Fluid Embolism]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/962?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Amniotic fluid embolism is a rare and often fatal complication of pregnancy. We report the successful multidisciplinary management of a woman who developed a coagulopathy from a presumed amniotic fluid embolism after forceps-assisted vaginal delivery requiring recombinant factor VIIa, and pulmonary arterial hypertension requiring a right ventricular assist device.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nagarsheth, N. P., Pinney, S., Bassily-Marcus, A., Anyanwu, A., Friedman, L., Beilin, Y.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Obstetrics, Resuscitation, Equipment, Technology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817f10e8</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Successful Placement of a Right Ventricular Assist Device for Treatment of a Presumed Amniotic Fluid Embolism]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>964</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>962</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/965?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Automated Correction of Room Location Errors in Anesthesia Information Management Systems]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/965?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> Anesthesia information management systems (AIMS) and operating room information management systems (ORIMS) are both used in operating rooms (OR). Anesthesia providers use AIMS to document their care in near real-time, including milestone events, and these systems automatically record vital signs from patient monitors. Circulating nurses use ORIMS primarily to document procedural information. Because of automatic documentation, AIMS would be ideal platforms for OR managerial decision support if the correct locations of cases in progress were known accurately. Trust is diminished if recommendations are poor.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> We compiled room location error rates from prior analyses of ORIMS data. Data from 24 consecutive 4-wk periods (45,459 cases) were analyzed from one hospital where both ORIMS and AIMS data were available. The actual location of cases was inferred from the physical location of the workstation recording the majority of pulse oximetry saturations. These were compared to the listed location in the AIMS and the final corrected location in the ORIMS. The scheduled and final ORIMS locations were compared to determine how often location changes were updated before the start of anesthesia. The location of cases was inferred in near real-time by using the identifier of the AIMS workstation transmitting pulse oximetry saturated electrocardiogram heart rate, and end-tidal CO<SUB>2</SUB> partial pressures.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Location error rates ranged from 0% to 7.5% at 42 hospitals. The error rate at the studied hospital was just 0.4%, showing that the hospital was suitable for investigation. The 0.4% error rate was based on cases listed as overlapping in the same OR, and thus under-estimated the actual error rate in the ORIMS (1.0%). With education, there was a decrease in the moved cases in the ORIMS whose location was not changed before the start of anesthesia (9.3%&ndash;2.0%, <I>P</I> &lt; 10<sup>&ndash;5</sup>). Despite the significant improvement (<I>P</I> &lt; 10<sup>&ndash;5</sup>) in the error rate between the AIMS listed and actual locations, the residual AIMS real-time error rate was 4.1% of cases. Use of vital sign data reduced errors to &lt;0.1%.</p>
<p><b>CONCLUSIONS: </b> Education can only modestly improve the accuracy of OR locations in ORIMS and AIMS data. The actual location can be inferred, either in near real-time or afterwards, from the AIMS workstation transmitting vital sign data. This addresses the fundamental problem of cases having more than one location during the course of anesthetic care (e.g., holding area, block room, OR, and postanesthesia care unit), which cannot be determined from scheduled ORIMS or listed AIMS locations.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Epstein, R. H., Dexter, F., Piotrowski, E.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Economics and Health Care Research]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817e7b99</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Automated Correction of Room Location Errors in Anesthesia Information Management Systems]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>971</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>965</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND POLICY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/972?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Clinicians Consistently Exceed a Typical Person's Short-Term Memory During Preoperative Teaching]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/972?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>INTRODUCTION: </b> Patient education is a critical part of preparation for surgery. Little research on provider-to-patient teaching has been conducted with systematic focus on the quantity of information provided to patients. This is important to assess because short-term memory capacity for information such as preoperative instruction is limited to roughly seven units of content.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> We studied the information-giving practices of anesthesiologists and nurse practitioners during preoperative teaching by examining transcripts from 26 tape recorded preoperative evaluation appointments. We developed a novel coding system to measure: 1) quantity of information, 2) frequency of medical terminology, 3) number of patient questions, and 4) number of memory reinforcements used during the consultation. Results are reported as mean &plusmn; sd.</p>
<p><b>RESULTS: </b> Anesthesiologists and nurse practitioners vastly exceeded patients&rsquo; short-term memory capacity. Nurse practitioners gave significantly more information to patients than did physicians (112 &plusmn; 37 vs 49 &plusmn; 25 items per interview, <I>P</I> &lt; 0.01). This higher level of information-giving was not influenced by the question-asking behaviors of the patients. Nurse practitioners and physicians used similar numbers of medical terms (4.0 &plusmn; 2.4 vs 3.7 &plusmn; 2.8 explained terms per interview), and memory-supporting reinforcements (2.3 &plusmn; 3.0 vs 1.4 &plusmn; 2.0 reinforcements per interview).</p>
<p><b>DISCUSSION: </b> Given the known limits of short-term memory, clinicians would be well advised to carefully consider their patterns of information-giving and their use of memory-reinforcing strategies for critical information.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sandberg, E. H., Sharma, R., Wiklund, R., Sandberg, W. S.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Economics and Health Care Research, Preoperative Evaluation]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817eea85</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Clinicians Consistently Exceed a Typical Person's Short-Term Memory During Preoperative Teaching]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>978</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>972</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>ECONOMICS, EDUCATION, AND POLICY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/979?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Neurotrauma: A Review]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/979?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>It is now well recognized that low cerebral blood flow (and cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP)) is associated with poor outcome after traumatic brain injury. What is less clear is whether altering cerebral blood flow or CPP will lead to clinical improvement. Initial studies indicated that increasing CPP may be beneficial and the Brain Trauma Foundation acknowledged this by incorporating a target of 70 mm Hg in the 1996 guidelines. However, the lack of a demonstrable benefit and the increased complication rate associated with this approach led to a reduction in the CPP goal to 60 mm Hg. More recently, evidence that autoregulation may be disrupted after traumatic brain injury has led some authors to propose an individualized approach to CPP management. Furthermore, with the advent of advanced neuromonitoring techniques, clinicians are able to more closely monitor the effects of hemodynamic manipulations on cerebral metabolism. As yet, there is no strong outcome evidence to support this approach. Until then, the current debate over the optimal approach to CPP management is likely to continue.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[White, H., Venkatesh, B.]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-19</dc:date>
<dc:subject><![CDATA[Trauma, Neuroanesthesia, Physiology]]></dc:subject>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1213/ane.0b013e31817e7b1a</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Cerebral Perfusion Pressure in Neurotrauma: A Review]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>International Anesthesia Research Society</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>3</prism:number>
<prism:volume>107</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>988</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-09-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>979</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>NEUROSURGICAL ANESTHESIOLOGY</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/989?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Lengthening of the Trachea During Neck Extension: Which Part of the Trachea Is Stretched?]]></title>
<link>http://www.anesthesia-analgesia.org/cgi/content/short/107/3/989?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p><b>BACKGROUND: </b> We sought to determine the distances of the three segments of the airway from upper incisors to carina in intubated patients in three different neck positions.</p>
<p><b>METHODS: </b> Twenty patients undergoing elective surgery were studied. The airway was divided into three segments: upper incisor to vocal cords (UI-VC), vocal cords to sternal notch (VC-SN), and sternal notch to the carina (SN-CA). After general anesthesia and tracheal tube placement, the circuit was connected and the lungs ventilated. A bronchoscope was inserted through a ported elbow adapter until the tip just contacted carina. A marker tape was placed on the bronchoscope immediately above the adapter port. As the bronchoscope was withdrawn to the sternal notch (by transillumination), vocal cords and upper incisor (endoscopic visualization), three corresponding markers were placed along the bronchoscope. The three segments of the airway were obtained by measuring the distances between the four markers. Measurements were taken with the patient&rsquo;s neck in f